🖌همان گرفیتی بنکسی از نزدیک @pakruh جامعه‌شناسان رسم گرفیتی را مانند دیوارنویسی‌های معمولی، نوعی وندالیسم به شمار می‌آورند و قانون هم آن را جرم می‌داند.
🖌همان گرفیتی بنکسی از نزدیک @pakruh جامعه‌شناسان رسم گرفیتی را مانند دیوارنویسی‌های معمولی، نوعی وندالیسم به شمار می‌آورند و قانون هم آن را جرم می‌داند.
The Russian invasion of Ukraine has been a driving force in markets for the past few weeks. Recently, Durav wrote on his Telegram channel that users' right to privacy, in light of the war in Ukraine, is "sacred, now more than ever." The message was not authentic, with the real Zelenskiy soon denying the claim on his official Telegram channel, but the incident highlighted a major problem: disinformation quickly spreads unchecked on the encrypted app. Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders. One thing that Telegram now offers to all users is the ability to “disappear” messages or set remote deletion deadlines. That enables users to have much more control over how long people can access what you’re sending them. Given that Russian law enforcement officials are reportedly (via Insider) stopping people in the street and demanding to read their text messages, this could be vital to protect individuals from reprisals.
from de
