[✍ در فرصتی بحثی را خدمت دوستان ارائه خواهم داد که می‌توان آن را نقد این محتوا و چند محتوای مرتبط دیگر به شمار آورد، اما در اصل به عنوان نقد این مطلب نوشته نشده، قسمتی از یک بخش از یک کتابِ ناتمام است که سال‌ها قبل نوشته شده و می‌توان از آن به عنوان نقد این محتوا استفاده کرد.]
[✍ در فرصتی بحثی را خدمت دوستان ارائه خواهم داد که می‌توان آن را نقد این محتوا و چند محتوای مرتبط دیگر به شمار آورد، اما در اصل به عنوان نقد این مطلب نوشته نشده، قسمتی از یک بخش از یک کتابِ ناتمام است که سال‌ها قبل نوشته شده و می‌توان از آن به عنوان نقد این محتوا استفاده کرد.]
If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats. Some privacy experts say Telegram is not secure enough Individual messages can be fully encrypted. But the user has to turn on that function. It's not automatic, as it is on Signal and WhatsApp. Telegram has gained a reputation as the “secure” communications app in the post-Soviet states, but whenever you make choices about your digital security, it’s important to start by asking yourself, “What exactly am I securing? And who am I securing it from?” These questions should inform your decisions about whether you are using the right tool or platform for your digital security needs. Telegram is certainly not the most secure messaging app on the market right now. Its security model requires users to place a great deal of trust in Telegram’s ability to protect user data. For some users, this may be good enough for now. For others, it may be wiser to move to a different platform for certain kinds of high-risk communications. On February 27th, Durov posted that Channels were becoming a source of unverified information and that the company lacks the ability to check on their veracity. He urged users to be mistrustful of the things shared on Channels, and initially threatened to block the feature in the countries involved for the length of the war, saying that he didn’t want Telegram to be used to aggravate conflict or incite ethnic hatred. He did, however, walk back this plan when it became clear that they had also become a vital communications tool for Ukrainian officials and citizens to help coordinate their resistance and evacuations.
from in
