Друзья, подключайтесь с эфиру в ВК в 14.00 или смотрите позже в записи. Пообщаемся с военным фотографом Евгением Кель. И Евгений проведет розыгрыш своего Народного календаря, смотрите чтобы узнать условия
Друзья, подключайтесь с эфиру в ВК в 14.00 или смотрите позже в записи. Пообщаемся с военным фотографом Евгением Кель. И Евгений проведет розыгрыш своего Народного календаря, смотрите чтобы узнать условия
Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders. In addition, Telegram's architecture limits the ability to slow the spread of false information: the lack of a central public feed, and the fact that comments are easily disabled in channels, reduce the space for public pushback. Some people used the platform to organize ahead of the storming of the U.S. Capitol in January 2021, and last month Senator Mark Warner sent a letter to Durov urging him to curb Russian information operations on Telegram. Despite Telegram's origins, its approach to users' security has privacy advocates worried. Unlike Silicon Valley giants such as Facebook and Twitter, which run very public anti-disinformation programs, Brooking said: "Telegram is famously lax or absent in its content moderation policy."
from us
