Maybe because rebelling against traditional society is the gayest thing imaginable? Not that a Redditor could get it.

So hecking based, rabbi yeshua bar mirriam whipped some Jews in a synagogue for not honoring the Jewish god properly. What an Aryan Chad “sarcasm”

Everyone agrees that there was never any cult of Loki.
- John Lindow

There is no evidence of [Loki's] worship among men.
- H.R. Ellis Davidson

[Loki] had no discernable place in pagan religion.
- Christopher Abram

There is nothing to suggest that Loki was ever worshipped.
- E.O.G. Turville-Petre

There was no cult of Loki, and place-names based on his name are equally unknown.
- Rudolf Simek

LOKI IS NOT A HEATHEN GOD.
This statement: "Getting hung up on the Abrahamic 'good vs. evil' mindset is counter productive. Good and evil weren't even concepts our ancestors subscribed to," in defense of honoring Loki demonstrates that Loki-worship is simply an anti-christian reaction and has nothing to do with heathenry. Loki is not a heathen god. He no longer is oathed to or living among the Aesir, and hasn't since ancient times, according to the primary sources of information we have on Loki, which are the poems of the Poetic Edda. See Lokasenna, verse 9, and keep reading to the end to verify these statements. All of the mythic events took place "in the early days", "when time was young" etc. They have long since past. Don't be fooled because you find Loki among the gods in the stories he have. They state they are speaking of past events. Raganarok, when Loki and his brood break free, is a future event. The source poems are clear on this if you read them. Snorri used the same sources, when he wrote his fictional story of the human Odin and his Asia-men from the Classical City of Troy, which clearly is Christian influenced (Snorri's Prose Edda, Introduction and Gylfaginning, is sonsistent on this point from beginning to end). In contrast, Snorri's source, the old heathen poems of the Poetic Edda, do not speak of Christ or Biblical characters and show no verifiable signs of Christian influence. Those that claim they do can only show superficial comparisons in support of that theory. Yet, Odin hanging on Yggdrassil to obtain wisdom isn't Jesus, and Baldur being sent to Hel, isn't Jesus. Nor is the Revelation of St. John like Ragnarok in any meaningful way. When one truly compares the two, there are clearly more differences than the very superficial similarities such people point out. In those same poetic sources, we find many things that are "good" and others that are "evil" and labeled as such. The gods give mankind the góða litr (good-form; Voluspa 18). Gullveig-Heid is '"ever the sweet-scent of evil people" or "evil women" (Voluspa 22). Loki eats the half-burnt heart of the "evil woman" and becomes pregnant with Fenrir (Hyndluljod 40-41). And we even have the direct statement, in the story of how Freyja obtained her necklace Brisingsamen (Sorla Thattur), that "most people are cheerful when Loki fares badly", Flestir urðu við þat kátir, er Loka gekk lítt til. He isn't considered a friend or an ally, particualry after being bound with the guts of his bastard son by Tyr's wife (Lokasenna 40) and being chained to rocks in Niflhel near his son Fenrir (as Freyr ably predicts in Lokasenna 41; Thyrmskvida 13 informs us that the Vanir are prophetic). Any attempt to recognize Loki as a god and a figure worthy of worship is simply rehashing the arguments of the 19th century Biblical School of Interpretation, which held that the Poetic Edda is based on Biblical and Classical sources that Icelanders learned from contact with the Irish in the 800s, a poorly supported theory which mainstream scholars debunked over a century ago! Yet it persists, typially among neo-pagans not familar with the sources of their professed faith. Study our sources, there is a lot more there than contained in Snorri's Edda and the scholarship which defacto takes it as the primary source when it uses Snorri's Edda to explain his own source, the Poetic Edda. That assumes Snorri understood the poems the same way the old heathens did. Yet, he places it all in the framework and context of Roman Catholic philosophy and History. You do not find that in the Poetic Edda. And you do not find Loki outside of these two places, except in later Icelandic legendary sagas and Faroese folk ballads. There is even debate whether Loki was a pan-Germanic figure at all, since you do not find him outside of the Scandinavian sources by that name. So raising him to a figure representing elemental balance worthy of worship is unwarranted. Loki and his destructive brood are powerful forces of entropy, which the gods contanstly battle and ultimately overcome.

Calliope, Muse of Epic Poetry by Charles Meynier

The difference between Platonists and folkish pagans becomes very clear when you look at what their objections to Christianity are.

The Platonist objection to Christianity is that it subordinates reason to revelation and eternal truths to historical events. True religion should center on timeless metaphysical realities, like the eternal forms or "The Good", rather than on historical contingencies such as the incarnation or the resurrection. Christianity is too particular and not universal enough.

The folkish objection to Christianity is that it is a universalist and anti-tribal faith that undermines ethnic, cultural, and ancestral identity. It breaks with native traditions and replaces them with foreign ones. It is deracinating, globalizing, and spiritually homogenizing. It undermines rootedness, blood ties, and local customs. Christianity is too universal and not particular enough.

Platonism accepts Christianity's framing completely. Platonism sees how Christianity challenged and undermined ethnic religion and says that it didn't go far enough.

Platonism is the enemy of ethnic faiths and it is a mystery how it continues to have any association with paganism at all.

@folkishworldview

Never forget that, even though modern christians consider muslims a threat, christians killed more Europeans than any other religious group in history.

Subverters are always the first ones to beg for ceasefire once we start exposing them presenting it as infighting. Universalists are not Pagan by definition, so it has never been infighting, just taking out trash.

Universalists like talking about Gods, but all they know was taken from modern semi-academic circles such as YouTube gurus. Also, it’s ironic that he calls me politicized even though I barely touch politics while their circles are all about it (e.g. Varg).

From the horse-fucker’s mouth to his braindead followers. And people used to say that stj should be forgiven, that his platonic propaganda was a just a phase. Yeah, right, a phase which gave us an entire generation of zoomer atheists calling themselves pagan.

Keep in mind that this jew is the guy who introduced Survive the Jive to platonism and therefore is responsible for a nice chunk of platonists online.

Non-Folkish are Pagan in name only

Nice example of a fake pagan perennial heresy created.

1. Varg fan (either a placenta worshipper or just ignorant of what Varg believes)
2. Universalist (Eurasia in the name).
3. Either a shitskin living in Switzerland or a European larping as a Hindu.

But he wrote something about tradition and abrahamism so shills will let him in. They don’t care who gives them money anyway.

Viking by Piotr Arendzikowski

Happy birthday to Maxim Tesak. Heroes never die.

I've never liked christianity and christians, despised and hated their religious views. They are damn liars. No man can follow all the commandments listed in the Bible, not only because most christian just don’t know them, but also because they are impossible to follow, therefore a man who declares himself a christian automatically becomes a liar.

Maxim Tesak