«لما تشخصت بالقلق، عرفت أن الإنسان المصاب بالقلق يخترع أسباب للقلق لحماية نفسه، ما فيه شيء اسمه أنك تشفى من القلق دفعة وحدة، لازم تتعايش مع وجوده، أنا بدأت أتعامل مع القلق كمحفز للعمل والإنجاز، جربت أكتب عن القلق، اكتشفت أن ناس كثير يمرون بنفس تجربتي.»
«لما تشخصت بالقلق، عرفت أن الإنسان المصاب بالقلق يخترع أسباب للقلق لحماية نفسه، ما فيه شيء اسمه أنك تشفى من القلق دفعة وحدة، لازم تتعايش مع وجوده، أنا بدأت أتعامل مع القلق كمحفز للعمل والإنجاز، جربت أكتب عن القلق، اكتشفت أن ناس كثير يمرون بنفس تجربتي.»
#أمل_السهلاوي
BY "نبض 🔻
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders. Some privacy experts say Telegram is not secure enough Multiple pro-Kremlin media figures circulated the post's false claims, including prominent Russian journalist Vladimir Soloviev and the state-controlled Russian outlet RT, according to the DFR Lab's report. If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats. Despite Telegram's origins, its approach to users' security has privacy advocates worried.
from us
