Никто так не хочет смерти украинцев как их чухнувшие из страны собратья
— Лично я шел бы до границ Кубани, Курска и дальше, потому что это исторически наши территории. — Как вы относитесь к действиям ТЦК? — Абсолютно нормально, у них есть свой план, и они его выполняют. — Что нужно, чтобы вы приняли участие в войне? — Ну, сложный вопрос. От меня больше финансовой пользы здесь, в Барселоне.
Никто так не хочет смерти украинцев как их чухнувшие из страны собратья
— Лично я шел бы до границ Кубани, Курска и дальше, потому что это исторически наши территории. — Как вы относитесь к действиям ТЦК? — Абсолютно нормально, у них есть свой план, и они его выполняют. — Что нужно, чтобы вы приняли участие в войне? — Ну, сложный вопрос. От меня больше финансовой пользы здесь, в Барселоне.
A Russian Telegram channel with over 700,000 followers is spreading disinformation about Russia's invasion of Ukraine under the guise of providing "objective information" and fact-checking fake news. Its influence extends beyond the platform, with major Russian publications, government officials, and journalists citing the page's posts. Perpetrators of such fraud use various marketing techniques to attract subscribers on their social media channels. Telegram has become more interventionist over time, and has steadily increased its efforts to shut down these accounts. But this has also meant that the company has also engaged with lawmakers more generally, although it maintains that it doesn’t do so willingly. For instance, in September 2021, Telegram reportedly blocked a chat bot in support of (Putin critic) Alexei Navalny during Russia’s most recent parliamentary elections. Pavel Durov was quoted at the time saying that the company was obliged to follow a “legitimate” law of the land. He added that as Apple and Google both follow the law, to violate it would give both platforms a reason to boot the messenger from its stores. If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats. "And that set off kind of a battle royale for control of the platform that Durov eventually lost," said Nathalie Maréchal of the Washington advocacy group Ranking Digital Rights.
from us
