📹Квадрокоптеры отряда "Шторм-1" 39 бригады 68 АК сбрасывают смертоносные боеприпасы на головы боевиков ВСУ
Смертоносные боеприпасы, прямо на позиции боевиков ВСУ, сбрасываются опытными операторами квадрокоптеров отряда "Шторм-1" 39 отдельной мотострелковой бригады 68 армейского корпуса. Каждый удар квадрокоптеров не только наносит значительный урон противнику, но и снижает его боевой потенциал и морально-психологическое состояние.
Подписывайтесьна телеграмм канал Народная милиция ДНР, чтобы увидеть войну нашими глазами
📹Квадрокоптеры отряда "Шторм-1" 39 бригады 68 АК сбрасывают смертоносные боеприпасы на головы боевиков ВСУ
Смертоносные боеприпасы, прямо на позиции боевиков ВСУ, сбрасываются опытными операторами квадрокоптеров отряда "Шторм-1" 39 отдельной мотострелковой бригады 68 армейского корпуса. Каждый удар квадрокоптеров не только наносит значительный урон противнику, но и снижает его боевой потенциал и морально-психологическое состояние.
Подписывайтесьна телеграмм канал Народная милиция ДНР, чтобы увидеть войну нашими глазами
Oleksandra Matviichuk, a Kyiv-based lawyer and head of the Center for Civil Liberties, called Durov’s position "very weak," and urged concrete improvements. On February 27th, Durov posted that Channels were becoming a source of unverified information and that the company lacks the ability to check on their veracity. He urged users to be mistrustful of the things shared on Channels, and initially threatened to block the feature in the countries involved for the length of the war, saying that he didn’t want Telegram to be used to aggravate conflict or incite ethnic hatred. He did, however, walk back this plan when it became clear that they had also become a vital communications tool for Ukrainian officials and citizens to help coordinate their resistance and evacuations. Multiple pro-Kremlin media figures circulated the post's false claims, including prominent Russian journalist Vladimir Soloviev and the state-controlled Russian outlet RT, according to the DFR Lab's report. Perpetrators of these scams will create a public group on Telegram to promote these investment packages that are usually accompanied by fake testimonies and sometimes advertised as being Shariah-compliant. Interested investors will be asked to directly message the representatives to begin investing in the various investment packages offered. At the start of 2018, the company attempted to launch an Initial Coin Offering (ICO) which would enable it to enable payments (and earn the cash that comes from doing so). The initial signals were promising, especially given Telegram’s user base is already fairly crypto-savvy. It raised an initial tranche of cash – worth more than a billion dollars – to help develop the coin before opening sales to the public. Unfortunately, third-party sales of coins bought in those initial fundraising rounds raised the ire of the SEC, which brought the hammer down on the whole operation. In 2020, officials ordered Telegram to pay a fine of $18.5 million and hand back much of the cash that it had raised.
from us
