It’s Friday Night.

#FridayNight

🚨 NEW: FORTISSAX is TYPING

Hellenism was the largest religion in the Western world prior to the rise of Christianity. It was followed from Britain to Greece, from Spain to Romania, and was the first civilization-wide faith for Europeans.

https://fortissax.substack.com/p/a-pagan-confession

Canada’s immigration problems started almost immediately after we moved away from British and French exclusivity.

- 1900s - Indian nationalists illegally emigrate to and infiltrate Canada to siphon wealth and resources for terrorist activities, assassinate immigration inspector William Hopkinson on the steps of a Vancouver courthouse.

– 1920s – Radical political movements like the Communist Party of Canada drew disproportionately from Eastern European and Ashkenazi communities, alarming officials.

– 1946 – Two thirds of Canadians told Gallup they opposed immigration from Europe, and a majority wanted Asians and Jews excluded.

– 1947 – Prime Minister Mackenzie King stated plainly that “Canada is perfectly within her rights in selecting the persons whom we regard as desirable future citizens” and that no one had a “fundamental right” to enter. He promised immigration would remain cautious, explicitly affirming Anglo-French priority.

– 1952 – More than half of Canadians told Gallup the country did not need immigrants.

– 1955 – Nearly sixty percent supported keeping Canada’s discriminatory policies in place.

– 1956 – Immigration minister Jack Pickersgill admitted reforms had to be introduced quietly because the public opposed them.

– Late 1950s – Officials continued using selective programs (e.g. for domestic workers, agricultural labourers, displaced persons) rather than open announcements, precisely to avoid a public backlash.

– 1960 – Almost seventy percent of Canadians disapproved of increasing immigration.

– 1961 – A majority still wanted to restrict non-white entry.

– Early 1960s – The Department of Citizenship and Immigration deliberately downplayed its policy changes in public communications. The new regulations of 1962, which ended explicit racial discrimination, were implemented without fanfare.

– 1960s – Even Diefenbaker’s and Pearson’s governments avoided public campaigns about their reforms; officials described their approach as “gradual” and “quiet,” ensuring that policy shifted before the public had a chance to react.

- 1965 - Lester B. Pearson elected, Canadian Red Ensign forcibly changed to the maple leaf flag

– 1967 – The points system was introduced without broad consultation or debate, framed in bureaucratic technical language rather than political argument, which minimized scrutiny.

– 1971 – Nearly eighty percent of Canadians opposed immigration, yet Pierre Trudeau declared multiculturalism official policy. It was presented as a cultural program more than a demographic one, softening the impression of change while entrenching it at the state level.

- 1988 - Canadian Multiculturalism Act passed by conservative Brian Mulroney.

- 2006 - Stephen Harper floods Canada with 3 million immigrants, mostly from China, India and the Phillipines

- 2015 - Justin Trudeau elected, continues his father’s policies for a decade, population jumps from 37 to 43 million by 2025.

Ladies and gentlemen, I regret to inform you, that:

*breathes in*

The White Ethnics are At It Again

Suka blyaatttt Kanadskyi

https://x.com/fortysacks/status/1957171203606446140

Get your cheap tracksuit gold chain balaclava 90 IQ ghetto cigarette soup ass the fuck OUT of my country.

Just so you understand, as a foreigner, whether you’re white or not, saying you like the maple leaf flag is saying:

“I like the flag of insane shitlibs that symbolizes nothing, who destroyed the country with open borders and forced it onto the people”. Try to imagine how that looks to Canadians nationalists.

The maple leaf flag and multiculturalism are inseparable. It started with foreign whites. Thats why this is a sensitive topic.

No, Canadian nationalists will not change our national symbols to accommodate you. But the door is open if you accept our national identity.

An Australian subscriber asked me what my thoughts were on Joel Davis’s take on the necessity of national socialism. I respect Davis and Co. in their work to defend Australia, but we disagree on a few things.

https://x.com/fortysacks/status/1957219264332550460?s=

I believe the mix-up here, with respect to Canada’s character and history, comes from the presumption by the Australian that Canada is similar to the United States in its origins.

This could not be further from the truth. The arguments for national socialism as a safeguard against liberalism are directed at the United States, not Canada. Canada’s foundation as a militarized anti-liberal state in both its British and French parts does not fit that framework, in addition to other considerations.

Australia was founded more recently, in keeping with the British version of Enlightenment liberal principles.

Canada, by contrast, was born when the Loyalists of the British Crown in the American Revolution and the Royalistes of the Ancien Régime fought against the Americans and the French Republic.

Our heritage as pre-liberal ethnic nationalists and traditionalists, with a communitarian culture and corporatist economy, provides all the inspiration we need. We do not need to adopt the principles of national socialism. Parallel ideas are here already.

*breathes in*

The White…

Ohio like Ontario produces some of the best Right Wing Dissidents. Living in the hell that is either Ontario or Ohio