Жалко, что нет хештега, начинающегося на «е», заканчивающегося на «банько». Он полнее отразил бы суть явления Эта штуковина изготовилась с полгодика назад. Стоит на рабочем столе, ручки-карандаши в нее втыкаются. Каждый элемент в ней (каждый!) символизирует какой-то этап жизни. Дальше в коменте.
Жалко, что нет хештега, начинающегося на «е», заканчивающегося на «банько». Он полнее отразил бы суть явления Эта штуковина изготовилась с полгодика назад. Стоит на рабочем столе, ручки-карандаши в нее втыкаются. Каждый элемент в ней (каждый!) символизирует какой-то этап жизни. Дальше в коменте.
Now safely in France with his spouse and three of his children, Kliuchnikov scrolls through Telegram to learn about the devastation happening in his home country. Asked about its stance on disinformation, Telegram spokesperson Remi Vaughn told AFP: "As noted by our CEO, the sheer volume of information being shared on channels makes it extremely difficult to verify, so it's important that users double-check what they read." If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats. On February 27th, Durov posted that Channels were becoming a source of unverified information and that the company lacks the ability to check on their veracity. He urged users to be mistrustful of the things shared on Channels, and initially threatened to block the feature in the countries involved for the length of the war, saying that he didn’t want Telegram to be used to aggravate conflict or incite ethnic hatred. He did, however, walk back this plan when it became clear that they had also become a vital communications tool for Ukrainian officials and citizens to help coordinate their resistance and evacuations. DFR Lab sent the image through Microsoft Azure's Face Verification program and found that it was "highly unlikely" that the person in the second photo was the same as the first woman. The fact-checker Logically AI also found the claim to be false. The woman, Olena Kurilo, was also captured in a video after the airstrike and shown to have the injuries.
from us
