Это Гасан Гусейнов, страстный любитель международных террористов и отъявленный русофоб (а в НИУ ВШЭ и РАНХиГС до недавнего времени других и не держали), освещающий своими лекциями стены Ельцин-центра, яростно жаждущий изоляции России, визуализируя ее как «необитаемый (так в оригинале у доктора филологии – К.Ш.) остров с людоедами». Вероятно, этим языковой эквилибрист Гусейнов, ускользающий от судебно-лингвистических экспертиз, хотел сказать, что людей (тех, которые «со светлыми лицами») в России не осталось, а остались одни нелюди-людоеды. Ну чем не референтный «интеллектуал» для пана Шабанова, с его «вылезшими из грязных подвалов» совками.👇👇👇
Это Гасан Гусейнов, страстный любитель международных террористов и отъявленный русофоб (а в НИУ ВШЭ и РАНХиГС до недавнего времени других и не держали), освещающий своими лекциями стены Ельцин-центра, яростно жаждущий изоляции России, визуализируя ее как «необитаемый (так в оригинале у доктора филологии – К.Ш.) остров с людоедами». Вероятно, этим языковой эквилибрист Гусейнов, ускользающий от судебно-лингвистических экспертиз, хотел сказать, что людей (тех, которые «со светлыми лицами») в России не осталось, а остались одни нелюди-людоеды. Ну чем не референтный «интеллектуал» для пана Шабанова, с его «вылезшими из грязных подвалов» совками.👇👇👇
These entities are reportedly operating nine Telegram channels with more than five million subscribers to whom they were making recommendations on selected listed scrips. Such recommendations induced the investors to deal in the said scrips, thereby creating artificial volume and price rise. Update March 8, 2022: EFF has clarified that Channels and Groups are not fully encrypted, end-to-end, updated our post to link to Telegram’s FAQ for Cloud and Secret chats, updated to clarify that auto-delete is available for group and channel admins, and added some additional links. Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders. Channels are not fully encrypted, end-to-end. All communications on a Telegram channel can be seen by anyone on the channel and are also visible to Telegram. Telegram may be asked by a government to hand over the communications from a channel. Telegram has a history of standing up to Russian government requests for data, but how comfortable you are relying on that history to predict future behavior is up to you. Because Telegram has this data, it may also be stolen by hackers or leaked by an internal employee. On February 27th, Durov posted that Channels were becoming a source of unverified information and that the company lacks the ability to check on their veracity. He urged users to be mistrustful of the things shared on Channels, and initially threatened to block the feature in the countries involved for the length of the war, saying that he didn’t want Telegram to be used to aggravate conflict or incite ethnic hatred. He did, however, walk back this plan when it became clear that they had also become a vital communications tool for Ukrainian officials and citizens to help coordinate their resistance and evacuations.
from us
