#СтруктураМомента: попытки пресс-службы США "на домашних подмостках" смягчить значимость факта состоявшегося разговора не должны вводить в заблуждение.
РБК: «Я считаю, что наша страна рассматривает Путина и Россию как серьезного соперника в регионе, а временами и как противника. Президент сказал, что ему нравится поддерживать хорошие дипломатические отношения с лидерами по всему миру», — сказала пресс-секретарь Белого дома Каролин Левитт на брифинге.
#СтруктураМомента: попытки пресс-службы США "на домашних подмостках" смягчить значимость факта состоявшегося разговора не должны вводить в заблуждение.
РБК: «Я считаю, что наша страна рассматривает Путина и Россию как серьезного соперника в регионе, а временами и как противника. Президент сказал, что ему нравится поддерживать хорошие дипломатические отношения с лидерами по всему миру», — сказала пресс-секретарь Белого дома Каролин Левитт на брифинге.
At its heart, Telegram is little more than a messaging app like WhatsApp or Signal. But it also offers open channels that enable a single user, or a group of users, to communicate with large numbers in a method similar to a Twitter account. This has proven to be both a blessing and a curse for Telegram and its users, since these channels can be used for both good and ill. Right now, as Wired reports, the app is a key way for Ukrainians to receive updates from the government during the invasion. In addition, Telegram's architecture limits the ability to slow the spread of false information: the lack of a central public feed, and the fact that comments are easily disabled in channels, reduce the space for public pushback. Channels are not fully encrypted, end-to-end. All communications on a Telegram channel can be seen by anyone on the channel and are also visible to Telegram. Telegram may be asked by a government to hand over the communications from a channel. Telegram has a history of standing up to Russian government requests for data, but how comfortable you are relying on that history to predict future behavior is up to you. Because Telegram has this data, it may also be stolen by hackers or leaked by an internal employee. If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats. 'Wild West'
from us
