Як нам стала вядома, у чэрвені Міколу і многіх іншых палітзняволенных гродненскай турмы адправілі ў ШІЗА. Праз два месяцы Мікола дагэтуль там.
Больш за тое, уже болей года Мікола знаходзіцца ў адзіночнай камеры. У адпаведнасці з міжнародным правам (Правіла Манделы ААН, ад 2015), адзіночнае заключэнне болей за 15 дзён лічыцца катаваннем, бо яго прымяненне нават на працягу кароткага часу можа прынесці непапраўную шкоду здароўю чалавека.
Мы спадзяемся, што нават у стане ізаляцыі Мікола адчувае падтрымку сяброў, блізкіх і ўсіх салідарных з ім.
Як нам стала вядома, у чэрвені Міколу і многіх іншых палітзняволенных гродненскай турмы адправілі ў ШІЗА. Праз два месяцы Мікола дагэтуль там.
Больш за тое, уже болей года Мікола знаходзіцца ў адзіночнай камеры. У адпаведнасці з міжнародным правам (Правіла Манделы ААН, ад 2015), адзіночнае заключэнне болей за 15 дзён лічыцца катаваннем, бо яго прымяненне нават на працягу кароткага часу можа прынесці непапраўную шкоду здароўю чалавека.
Мы спадзяемся, што нават у стане ізаляцыі Мікола адчувае падтрымку сяброў, блізкіх і ўсіх салідарных з ім.
Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders. If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats. In the United States, Telegram's lower public profile has helped it mostly avoid high level scrutiny from Congress, but it has not gone unnoticed. Channels are not fully encrypted, end-to-end. All communications on a Telegram channel can be seen by anyone on the channel and are also visible to Telegram. Telegram may be asked by a government to hand over the communications from a channel. Telegram has a history of standing up to Russian government requests for data, but how comfortable you are relying on that history to predict future behavior is up to you. Because Telegram has this data, it may also be stolen by hackers or leaked by an internal employee. "The argument from Telegram is, 'You should trust us because we tell you that we're trustworthy,'" Maréchal said. "It's really in the eye of the beholder whether that's something you want to buy into."
from us
