Notice: file_put_contents(): Write of 8537 bytes failed with errno=28 No space left on device in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 50 نویسا - واحد نگارش مؤسسه مصاف | Telegram Webview: Masaf_Nevis/4990 -
🔹هجوم به خانۀ حضرت زهرا سلاماللهعلیها، یک بار اتفاق نیفتاد، بلکه تا سه بارِ آن را من برداشت میکنم. خیلی عجیب بود؛ میگویند دفعۀ اول وقتی اینها حمله کردند، تا حضرت زهرا آمدند و...
🔹هجوم به خانۀ حضرت زهرا سلاماللهعلیها، یک بار اتفاق نیفتاد، بلکه تا سه بارِ آن را من برداشت میکنم. خیلی عجیب بود؛ میگویند دفعۀ اول وقتی اینها حمله کردند، تا حضرت زهرا آمدند و...
Just days after Russia invaded Ukraine, Durov wrote that Telegram was "increasingly becoming a source of unverified information," and he worried about the app being used to "incite ethnic hatred." Given the pro-privacy stance of the platform, it’s taken as a given that it’ll be used for a number of reasons, not all of them good. And Telegram has been attached to a fair few scandals related to terrorism, sexual exploitation and crime. Back in 2015, Vox described Telegram as “ISIS’ app of choice,” saying that the platform’s real use is the ability to use channels to distribute material to large groups at once. Telegram has acted to remove public channels affiliated with terrorism, but Pavel Durov reiterated that he had no business snooping on private conversations. But Telegram says people want to keep their chat history when they get a new phone, and they like having a data backup that will sync their chats across multiple devices. And that is why they let people choose whether they want their messages to be encrypted or not. When not turned on, though, chats are stored on Telegram's services, which are scattered throughout the world. But it has "disclosed 0 bytes of user data to third parties, including governments," Telegram states on its website. Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders. Despite Telegram's origins, its approach to users' security has privacy advocates worried.
from us