Совсем не порадовала информация, что планируют вернуться к нам всякие кока колы и макдаки ... А за ними и все остальные . Вопрос один - зачем ? Чтобы опять начать душить наш сектор , который только как, чуть - чуть приподнял голову ....
Плохо им ? А нам что с того ? Они уходили с нашего рынка , желая нас наказать ...
Может лучше сделаем так , чтоб нашему производителю стало лучше и легче, а не душить их и не возвращать тех, кому очень дойки российского сектора не хватает ?
Совсем не порадовала информация, что планируют вернуться к нам всякие кока колы и макдаки ... А за ними и все остальные . Вопрос один - зачем ? Чтобы опять начать душить наш сектор , который только как, чуть - чуть приподнял голову ....
Плохо им ? А нам что с того ? Они уходили с нашего рынка , желая нас наказать ...
Может лучше сделаем так , чтоб нашему производителю стало лучше и легче, а не душить их и не возвращать тех, кому очень дойки российского сектора не хватает ?
BY Добровольцы тыла🇷🇺
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
The gold standard of encryption, known as end-to-end encryption, where only the sender and person who receives the message are able to see it, is available on Telegram only when the Secret Chat function is enabled. Voice and video calls are also completely encrypted. Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders. You may recall that, back when Facebook started changing WhatsApp’s terms of service, a number of news outlets reported on, and even recommended, switching to Telegram. Pavel Durov even said that users should delete WhatsApp “unless you are cool with all of your photos and messages becoming public one day.” But Telegram can’t be described as a more-secure version of WhatsApp. On February 27th, Durov posted that Channels were becoming a source of unverified information and that the company lacks the ability to check on their veracity. He urged users to be mistrustful of the things shared on Channels, and initially threatened to block the feature in the countries involved for the length of the war, saying that he didn’t want Telegram to be used to aggravate conflict or incite ethnic hatred. He did, however, walk back this plan when it became clear that they had also become a vital communications tool for Ukrainian officials and citizens to help coordinate their resistance and evacuations. The original Telegram channel has expanded into a web of accounts for different locations, including specific pages made for individual Russian cities. There's also an English-language website, which states it is owned by the people who run the Telegram channels.
from us
