Jerome interviews Mark Thomey. He is formerly a board member of the League of The South and works with Southern Nationalist League. Check them out: here


Link to the interview can be found on the substack and or through the RSS

Email: [email protected]

Raise up the banner bearing the Chi-Rho, looking forward at the future. Golden light breaking through dark clouded skies in front of us. We shall pierce through the darkness and witness the light.

Do we (Catholics) share the same faith as the Methodists?

If you are honest with yourself, this is a blatant: "No, of course not."

There is some sophistry you could spin to argue the above point. Yes, they believe in Jesus Christ, baptism, a "similar" faith. And that is precisely what was done with the "Nouvelle Theologie," unity with non-Catholics at any cost, even to the point of denying the doctrines and dogmas that made the faith what it is. From a humanist understanding, its very hopeful, inclusive, diverse.... regardless of your religious denomination we are still united and can enter into the heavenly kingdom hand in hand singing kumbaya. Doctrines and dogmas is what separated us after all, and didn't Christ pray that "we all may be one."

History easily refutes these hopeful notions. Even recent papal encyclicals as well (IE Mortalium Animos-On Christian Unity)

https://www.complicitclergy.com/2024/12/18/watch-pagan-ritual-offered-during-mass/?

Novus Ordo "Infinite Dignity" is at it again

The dance around a sacred flame is deeply rooted in animist ideologies. By “bathing” in the flame, the dancer is ritually “purified,” believing themselves to become connected to the “spiritual energy” of the flame

#Germany #terror attack

Today's Epistle 1 Cor 4: 1-5 (as well as Mt 7:1) has been one that has been distorted amongst Novus Ordites, Protestants, and I would even say some Catholics. "Only God Can Judge." (this brief review is based upon the commentary of St. Thomas Aquinas on 1 Cor 4:1-5, perhaps a commentary on Mt 7:1 will be in the future)

There is a large historical context that is missing in much of the modern assessment/understanding:

In this section of the Epistle from St. Paul, he wrote to address divisions, moral issues, and doctrinal misunderstandings within the Corinthian church. The community, situated in the prosperous and cosmopolitan city of Corinth, was influenced by Greek culture, including its love of rhetoric, philosophy, and public debate. These tendencies led to factions within the church, as members aligned themselves with particular teachers (including pagan, IE Apollo) based on their perceived eloquence or status. Meaning they would prefer a certain minister (IE priest) of God over another based upon his rhetoric, and would thus rashly judge and look down upon a lesser minister of God. He is reminding the Corinthians (the faithful) that these apparent "lesser" ministers of God, are still of his royal priesthood, and become Persona In Christi, when dispensing of the sacraments. For if they do not receive Christ ministers, they will not obey them as Christ.

St Paul states this judgment should be reserved to the the Lord, i.e., it is God’s exclusive province to judge whether I am a faithful minister or not, because this pertains to the heart’s intention, which God alone can weigh: the Lord weighs the spirit (Prov 16:2); the heart is deceitful above all things, and desperately corrupt; who can understand it? I the Lord search the mind and try the heart (Jer 17:9).

Again when St. Paul states to judge not, he is prohibiting rash judgement. For some things are manifested not only by the evidence of the fact, being notorious, but also by confession or by the proved testimony of witnesses.