Notice: file_put_contents(): Write of 1273 bytes failed with errno=28 No space left on device in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 50
Warning: file_put_contents(): Only 8192 of 9465 bytes written, possibly out of free disk space in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 50 Украина не Россия❓ | Telegram Webview: UAnotRU/37344 -
Элитам послали вполне прозрачный сигнал о том, что язык нужно держать за зубами. Даже если ты весь такой патриотичный и находишься "в обойме". Ведь в этом случае такие эпические фейлы, какие допустили Цыгановых, выглядят особенно вызывающими... Вот зачем они пошли на это интервью Дудю, кому и что они хотели доказать?
Элитам послали вполне прозрачный сигнал о том, что язык нужно держать за зубами. Даже если ты весь такой патриотичный и находишься "в обойме". Ведь в этом случае такие эпические фейлы, какие допустили Цыгановых, выглядят особенно вызывающими... Вот зачем они пошли на это интервью Дудю, кому и что они хотели доказать?
Telegram boasts 500 million users, who share information individually and in groups in relative security. But Telegram's use as a one-way broadcast channel — which followers can join but not reply to — means content from inauthentic accounts can easily reach large, captive and eager audiences. Messages are not fully encrypted by default. That means the company could, in theory, access the content of the messages, or be forced to hand over the data at the request of a government. In addition, Telegram's architecture limits the ability to slow the spread of false information: the lack of a central public feed, and the fact that comments are easily disabled in channels, reduce the space for public pushback. If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats. It is unclear who runs the account, although Russia's official Ministry of Foreign Affairs Twitter account promoted the Telegram channel on Saturday and claimed it was operated by "a group of experts & journalists."
from us
