هذا وكنّا قد نثرنا مظلمتنا أمام الأمة، فلم توقف المجزرة ولم تلجم الضباع، واليوم تطالبوننا بكتم الصراخ، ونسيان الألم، ومسامحة الظالم، وتقبيل يد القاتل، والتحشيد وراء إمامٍ مُحْدِث نجس، والوثوق بخنجر مجوسي مسموم.
لمَ لا نختار قاداتنا من الأيادي الطاهرة؟ لمَ لا نستثمر الثغرات الحاصلة لاستبدال الفاسد بالصالح؟ لمَ لا نحشد وراء أهل الحق والعدل؟ لمَ لا نضغط على من فرّق الأمة أن يصحح آثامه ويعلن التوبة عمّا ارتكبه اتجاه أمتنا؟ ماذا نقول... ولكن نعذركم فربما داعمكم له رؤية أخرى.
هذا وكنّا قد نثرنا مظلمتنا أمام الأمة، فلم توقف المجزرة ولم تلجم الضباع، واليوم تطالبوننا بكتم الصراخ، ونسيان الألم، ومسامحة الظالم، وتقبيل يد القاتل، والتحشيد وراء إمامٍ مُحْدِث نجس، والوثوق بخنجر مجوسي مسموم.
لمَ لا نختار قاداتنا من الأيادي الطاهرة؟ لمَ لا نستثمر الثغرات الحاصلة لاستبدال الفاسد بالصالح؟ لمَ لا نحشد وراء أهل الحق والعدل؟ لمَ لا نضغط على من فرّق الأمة أن يصحح آثامه ويعلن التوبة عمّا ارتكبه اتجاه أمتنا؟ ماذا نقول... ولكن نعذركم فربما داعمكم له رؤية أخرى.
#الدسر
BY الدُّسُر
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders. Telegram has become more interventionist over time, and has steadily increased its efforts to shut down these accounts. But this has also meant that the company has also engaged with lawmakers more generally, although it maintains that it doesn’t do so willingly. For instance, in September 2021, Telegram reportedly blocked a chat bot in support of (Putin critic) Alexei Navalny during Russia’s most recent parliamentary elections. Pavel Durov was quoted at the time saying that the company was obliged to follow a “legitimate” law of the land. He added that as Apple and Google both follow the law, to violate it would give both platforms a reason to boot the messenger from its stores. Telegram has gained a reputation as the “secure” communications app in the post-Soviet states, but whenever you make choices about your digital security, it’s important to start by asking yourself, “What exactly am I securing? And who am I securing it from?” These questions should inform your decisions about whether you are using the right tool or platform for your digital security needs. Telegram is certainly not the most secure messaging app on the market right now. Its security model requires users to place a great deal of trust in Telegram’s ability to protect user data. For some users, this may be good enough for now. For others, it may be wiser to move to a different platform for certain kinds of high-risk communications. He floated the idea of restricting the use of Telegram in Ukraine and Russia, a suggestion that was met with fierce opposition from users. Shortly after, Durov backed off the idea. Andrey, a Russian entrepreneur living in Brazil who, fearing retaliation, asked that NPR not use his last name, said Telegram has become one of the few places Russians can access independent news about the war.
from us
