جاء الهجوم الذي استهدف نصرالله قبل ساعات بعد أن تلقت الحكومة الإسرائيلية معلومات تشير إلى أنه عقد للتو اجتماعًا قياديًا في منشأة تحت الأرض في الضاحية الجنوبية لبيروت
جاء الهجوم الذي استهدف نصرالله قبل ساعات بعد أن تلقت الحكومة الإسرائيلية معلومات تشير إلى أنه عقد للتو اجتماعًا قياديًا في منشأة تحت الأرض في الضاحية الجنوبية لبيروت
BY المنارة للاعلام
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders. You may recall that, back when Facebook started changing WhatsApp’s terms of service, a number of news outlets reported on, and even recommended, switching to Telegram. Pavel Durov even said that users should delete WhatsApp “unless you are cool with all of your photos and messages becoming public one day.” But Telegram can’t be described as a more-secure version of WhatsApp. Some people used the platform to organize ahead of the storming of the U.S. Capitol in January 2021, and last month Senator Mark Warner sent a letter to Durov urging him to curb Russian information operations on Telegram. Although some channels have been removed, the curation process is considered opaque and insufficient by analysts. As the war in Ukraine rages, the messaging app Telegram has emerged as the go-to place for unfiltered live war updates for both Ukrainian refugees and increasingly isolated Russians alike.
from us
