Кстати, все эти энерговойны являются хорошей лакмусовой бумажкой, позволяющей проявиться нутру народных избранников и прочих общественников… Приятно, что наш Сарсенбаев не затерялся среди тех, кто пытается выдать дифтариф за благо и не стал петь благодарственные оды Кобзеву за «героическое» расширение 1-го диапазона дифтарифа... Дифтариф зло при любых диапазонах. И ввёл его никто иной как Кобзев. https://www.group-telegram.com/SarsenbaevES/3173
Кстати, все эти энерговойны являются хорошей лакмусовой бумажкой, позволяющей проявиться нутру народных избранников и прочих общественников… Приятно, что наш Сарсенбаев не затерялся среди тех, кто пытается выдать дифтариф за благо и не стал петь благодарственные оды Кобзеву за «героическое» расширение 1-го диапазона дифтарифа... Дифтариф зло при любых диапазонах. И ввёл его никто иной как Кобзев. https://www.group-telegram.com/SarsenbaevES/3173
At its heart, Telegram is little more than a messaging app like WhatsApp or Signal. But it also offers open channels that enable a single user, or a group of users, to communicate with large numbers in a method similar to a Twitter account. This has proven to be both a blessing and a curse for Telegram and its users, since these channels can be used for both good and ill. Right now, as Wired reports, the app is a key way for Ukrainians to receive updates from the government during the invasion. Just days after Russia invaded Ukraine, Durov wrote that Telegram was "increasingly becoming a source of unverified information," and he worried about the app being used to "incite ethnic hatred." On February 27th, Durov posted that Channels were becoming a source of unverified information and that the company lacks the ability to check on their veracity. He urged users to be mistrustful of the things shared on Channels, and initially threatened to block the feature in the countries involved for the length of the war, saying that he didn’t want Telegram to be used to aggravate conflict or incite ethnic hatred. He did, however, walk back this plan when it became clear that they had also become a vital communications tool for Ukrainian officials and citizens to help coordinate their resistance and evacuations. In addition, Telegram's architecture limits the ability to slow the spread of false information: the lack of a central public feed, and the fact that comments are easily disabled in channels, reduce the space for public pushback.
from us
