Орк - эльфу: вы - не за мир, поскольку призываете Украину вооружаться, подстёгивая ядерную войну, не используете пацифистскую символику. Где пацифик, где голубь мира? При этом поднимаете флаги одной из воюющих армий, вы игнорируете военные преступления Киева. И стыдитесь флагов своей собственной страны. Значит вы просто предатели, власовцы, Ex-Russians, но никак не патриоты России.
Эльф - орку: нет, мы просто за мир, за свободу, за демократию.
Орк - эльфу: вы - не за мир, поскольку призываете Украину вооружаться, подстёгивая ядерную войну, не используете пацифистскую символику. Где пацифик, где голубь мира? При этом поднимаете флаги одной из воюющих армий, вы игнорируете военные преступления Киева. И стыдитесь флагов своей собственной страны. Значит вы просто предатели, власовцы, Ex-Russians, но никак не патриоты России.
Эльф - орку: нет, мы просто за мир, за свободу, за демократию.
In addition, Telegram's architecture limits the ability to slow the spread of false information: the lack of a central public feed, and the fact that comments are easily disabled in channels, reduce the space for public pushback. On December 23rd, 2020, Pavel Durov posted to his channel that the company would need to start generating revenue. In early 2021, he added that any advertising on the platform would not use user data for targeting, and that it would be focused on “large one-to-many channels.” He pledged that ads would be “non-intrusive” and that most users would simply not notice any change. "Like the bombing of the maternity ward in Mariupol," he said, "Even before it hits the news, you see the videos on the Telegram channels." The gold standard of encryption, known as end-to-end encryption, where only the sender and person who receives the message are able to see it, is available on Telegram only when the Secret Chat function is enabled. Voice and video calls are also completely encrypted. The War on Fakes channel has repeatedly attempted to push conspiracies that footage from Ukraine is somehow being falsified. One post on the channel from February 24 claimed without evidence that a widely viewed photo of a Ukrainian woman injured in an airstrike in the city of Chuhuiv was doctored and that the woman was seen in a different photo days later without injuries. The post, which has over 600,000 views, also baselessly claimed that the woman's blood was actually makeup or grape juice.
from us
