Verfassungsrechtler Prof. Dr. Boehme-Neßler über den "Habeck-#Schw**hkopf "-Skandal und den frühmorgendlichen Polizei-Überfall bei einer Familie wegen eines geteilten Posts. "Völlig unverhältnismäßig".
Verfassungsrechtler Prof. Dr. Boehme-Neßler über den "Habeck-#Schw**hkopf "-Skandal und den frühmorgendlichen Polizei-Überfall bei einer Familie wegen eines geteilten Posts. "Völlig unverhältnismäßig".
"He has to start being more proactive and to find a real solution to this situation, not stay in standby without interfering. It's a very irresponsible position from the owner of Telegram," she said. He adds: "Telegram has become my primary news source." Russians and Ukrainians are both prolific users of Telegram. They rely on the app for channels that act as newsfeeds, group chats (both public and private), and one-to-one communication. Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine, Telegram has remained an important lifeline for both Russians and Ukrainians, as a way of staying aware of the latest news and keeping in touch with loved ones. But Kliuchnikov, the Ukranian now in France, said he will use Signal or WhatsApp for sensitive conversations, but questions around privacy on Telegram do not give him pause when it comes to sharing information about the war. Given the pro-privacy stance of the platform, it’s taken as a given that it’ll be used for a number of reasons, not all of them good. And Telegram has been attached to a fair few scandals related to terrorism, sexual exploitation and crime. Back in 2015, Vox described Telegram as “ISIS’ app of choice,” saying that the platform’s real use is the ability to use channels to distribute material to large groups at once. Telegram has acted to remove public channels affiliated with terrorism, but Pavel Durov reiterated that he had no business snooping on private conversations.
from ar
