Если быть точнее, то Трамп описал это буквально в таких выражениях:
«Эрдоган умный человек… он, воспользовавшись слабостью России и Ирана, заключил сделку, послал своих людей под другими именами и в другой форме, и сейчас мы можем смело сказать что он взял под контроль Сирию».
Как заметили в соцсетях, данным заявлением Трамп фактически убил «сирийскую революцию» - которая, как в очередной раз подтвердилось, не такая уж и «сирийская».
Если быть точнее, то Трамп описал это буквально в таких выражениях:
«Эрдоган умный человек… он, воспользовавшись слабостью России и Ирана, заключил сделку, послал своих людей под другими именами и в другой форме, и сейчас мы можем смело сказать что он взял под контроль Сирию».
Как заметили в соцсетях, данным заявлением Трамп фактически убил «сирийскую революцию» - которая, как в очередной раз подтвердилось, не такая уж и «сирийская».
At this point, however, Durov had already been working on Telegram with his brother, and further planned a mobile-first social network with an explicit focus on anti-censorship. Later in April, he told TechCrunch that he had left Russia and had “no plans to go back,” saying that the nation was currently “incompatible with internet business at the moment.” He added later that he was looking for a country that matched his libertarian ideals to base his next startup. Telegram has gained a reputation as the “secure” communications app in the post-Soviet states, but whenever you make choices about your digital security, it’s important to start by asking yourself, “What exactly am I securing? And who am I securing it from?” These questions should inform your decisions about whether you are using the right tool or platform for your digital security needs. Telegram is certainly not the most secure messaging app on the market right now. Its security model requires users to place a great deal of trust in Telegram’s ability to protect user data. For some users, this may be good enough for now. For others, it may be wiser to move to a different platform for certain kinds of high-risk communications. Unlike Silicon Valley giants such as Facebook and Twitter, which run very public anti-disinformation programs, Brooking said: "Telegram is famously lax or absent in its content moderation policy." Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders. The War on Fakes channel has repeatedly attempted to push conspiracies that footage from Ukraine is somehow being falsified. One post on the channel from February 24 claimed without evidence that a widely viewed photo of a Ukrainian woman injured in an airstrike in the city of Chuhuiv was doctored and that the woman was seen in a different photo days later without injuries. The post, which has over 600,000 views, also baselessly claimed that the woman's blood was actually makeup or grape juice.
from ar
