Так "Витязь" ведь по ФСВНГ проходит, это не армейское подразделение, соответственно, и не учтено... Интересно, что на сей раз о потерях говорил не Конашенков, а Рудской, начальник ГОУ ГШ. Чья тема - оперативная обстановка, и ее он осветил достаточно объективно. Статистика безвозвратных потерь - вообще не его. Но стоит заметить, что их соотношение по убитым 1 к 10. При том, что Украина - обороняющаяся сторона. Как говорится, специальная литература в помощь.
Так "Витязь" ведь по ФСВНГ проходит, это не армейское подразделение, соответственно, и не учтено... Интересно, что на сей раз о потерях говорил не Конашенков, а Рудской, начальник ГОУ ГШ. Чья тема - оперативная обстановка, и ее он осветил достаточно объективно. Статистика безвозвратных потерь - вообще не его. Но стоит заметить, что их соотношение по убитым 1 к 10. При том, что Украина - обороняющаяся сторона. Как говорится, специальная литература в помощь.
BY Спец по специям
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders. In this regard, Sebi collaborated with the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI) to reduce the vulnerability of the securities market to manipulation through misuse of mass communication medium like bulk SMS. If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats. Telegram boasts 500 million users, who share information individually and in groups in relative security. But Telegram's use as a one-way broadcast channel — which followers can join but not reply to — means content from inauthentic accounts can easily reach large, captive and eager audiences. So, uh, whenever I hear about Telegram, it’s always in relation to something bad. What gives?
from ar
