Фильмы, про которые я рассказываю в выпуске, с тайм-кодами: 02:27 Сырое (2016) Raw 10:32 Титан (2021) Titane 20:18 XX (2017) 28:57 Свежатинка (2022) Fresh 38:58 Субстанция (2024) The Substance 49:10 Конкретный убийца (2023) Totally killer 59:22 Кровавая вечеринка (1982) The Slumber Party Massacre 01:06:25 Она умрет завтра (2020) She dies tomorrow
Фильмы, про которые я рассказываю в выпуске, с тайм-кодами: 02:27 Сырое (2016) Raw 10:32 Титан (2021) Titane 20:18 XX (2017) 28:57 Свежатинка (2022) Fresh 38:58 Субстанция (2024) The Substance 49:10 Конкретный убийца (2023) Totally killer 59:22 Кровавая вечеринка (1982) The Slumber Party Massacre 01:06:25 Она умрет завтра (2020) She dies tomorrow
So, uh, whenever I hear about Telegram, it’s always in relation to something bad. What gives? Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders. Although some channels have been removed, the curation process is considered opaque and insufficient by analysts. But because group chats and the channel features are not end-to-end encrypted, Galperin said user privacy is potentially under threat. In addition, Telegram's architecture limits the ability to slow the spread of false information: the lack of a central public feed, and the fact that comments are easily disabled in channels, reduce the space for public pushback.
from ar
