Telegram Group & Telegram Channel
Генерал-полковник Ивашов жёстко о политике правящих кругов и МИДа

YouTube▶️https://youtu.be/-T_RKhdXaLQ
VK▶️https://vk.com/video-146151386_456242149
RUTUBE▶️https://clck.ru/3DMeb4



group-telegram.com/a_articles/19208
Create:
Last Update:

Генерал-полковник Ивашов жёстко о политике правящих кругов и МИДа

YouTube▶️https://youtu.be/-T_RKhdXaLQ
VK▶️https://vk.com/video-146151386_456242149
RUTUBE▶️https://clck.ru/3DMeb4

BY Павел Иванов | Аудио статьи




Share with your friend now:
group-telegram.com/a_articles/19208

View MORE
Open in Telegram


Telegram | DID YOU KNOW?

Date: |

Given the pro-privacy stance of the platform, it’s taken as a given that it’ll be used for a number of reasons, not all of them good. And Telegram has been attached to a fair few scandals related to terrorism, sexual exploitation and crime. Back in 2015, Vox described Telegram as “ISIS’ app of choice,” saying that the platform’s real use is the ability to use channels to distribute material to large groups at once. Telegram has acted to remove public channels affiliated with terrorism, but Pavel Durov reiterated that he had no business snooping on private conversations. One thing that Telegram now offers to all users is the ability to “disappear” messages or set remote deletion deadlines. That enables users to have much more control over how long people can access what you’re sending them. Given that Russian law enforcement officials are reportedly (via Insider) stopping people in the street and demanding to read their text messages, this could be vital to protect individuals from reprisals. Groups are also not fully encrypted, end-to-end. This includes private groups. Private groups cannot be seen by other Telegram users, but Telegram itself can see the groups and all of the communications that you have in them. All of the same risks and warnings about channels can be applied to groups. "And that set off kind of a battle royale for control of the platform that Durov eventually lost," said Nathalie Maréchal of the Washington advocacy group Ranking Digital Rights. DFR Lab sent the image through Microsoft Azure's Face Verification program and found that it was "highly unlikely" that the person in the second photo was the same as the first woman. The fact-checker Logically AI also found the claim to be false. The woman, Olena Kurilo, was also captured in a video after the airstrike and shown to have the injuries.
from ar


Telegram Павел Иванов | Аудио статьи
FROM American