Всё юридическое сообщество (а если честно - то только его интеллектуальная верхушка) вчера сотрясалось от полемики вокруг Постановления Конституционного Суда по срокам исковой давности в антикоррупционных спорах.
По моему мнению, самой объективной является позиция, заключающаяся в том, что КС РФ выполнил политический заказ правящей элиты.
Но, в любом случае, изучать надо; не факт, коллеги, что очередное такое дело пройдёт мимо вас.
Всё юридическое сообщество (а если честно - то только его интеллектуальная верхушка) вчера сотрясалось от полемики вокруг Постановления Конституционного Суда по срокам исковой давности в антикоррупционных спорах.
По моему мнению, самой объективной является позиция, заключающаяся в том, что КС РФ выполнил политический заказ правящей элиты.
Но, в любом случае, изучать надо; не факт, коллеги, что очередное такое дело пройдёт мимо вас.
🏛 Поэтому - сначала само постановление. 👇
BY Адвокат Евгений Шингарёв
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
In the United States, Telegram's lower public profile has helped it mostly avoid high level scrutiny from Congress, but it has not gone unnoticed. Telegram has gained a reputation as the “secure” communications app in the post-Soviet states, but whenever you make choices about your digital security, it’s important to start by asking yourself, “What exactly am I securing? And who am I securing it from?” These questions should inform your decisions about whether you are using the right tool or platform for your digital security needs. Telegram is certainly not the most secure messaging app on the market right now. Its security model requires users to place a great deal of trust in Telegram’s ability to protect user data. For some users, this may be good enough for now. For others, it may be wiser to move to a different platform for certain kinds of high-risk communications. In this regard, Sebi collaborated with the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI) to reduce the vulnerability of the securities market to manipulation through misuse of mass communication medium like bulk SMS. But Telegram says people want to keep their chat history when they get a new phone, and they like having a data backup that will sync their chats across multiple devices. And that is why they let people choose whether they want their messages to be encrypted or not. When not turned on, though, chats are stored on Telegram's services, which are scattered throughout the world. But it has "disclosed 0 bytes of user data to third parties, including governments," Telegram states on its website. If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats.
from ar
