⚔️💬 За продвижение в социальных сетях расовой, религиозной или национальной розни - уголовная статья и 6 лет лишения свободы! В карточках рассказали о том, что такое экстремизм, какие бывают экстремистские организации, как наказывается участие в экстремистском сообществе! В новый год - без экстремизма!
✔️ Статья 282.1. УК РФ - "Организация экстремистского сообщества". Максимальное наказание - лишение свободы на срок до 6 лет!
О предателях, диверсантах, экстремистах, террористах и врагах пишите сюда: 📱@LETTER_TO_OPER_bot без регистрации, необходимости вводить персональные данные, в том числе личный номер телефона!
⚔️💬 За продвижение в социальных сетях расовой, религиозной или национальной розни - уголовная статья и 6 лет лишения свободы! В карточках рассказали о том, что такое экстремизм, какие бывают экстремистские организации, как наказывается участие в экстремистском сообществе! В новый год - без экстремизма!
✔️ Статья 282.1. УК РФ - "Организация экстремистского сообщества". Максимальное наказание - лишение свободы на срок до 6 лет!
О предателях, диверсантах, экстремистах, террористах и врагах пишите сюда: 📱@LETTER_TO_OPER_bot без регистрации, необходимости вводить персональные данные, в том числе личный номер телефона!
If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats. In a statement, the regulator said the search and seizure operation was carried out against seven individuals and one corporate entity at multiple locations in Ahmedabad and Bhavnagar in Gujarat, Neemuch in Madhya Pradesh, Delhi, and Mumbai. Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders. This ability to mix the public and the private, as well as the ability to use bots to engage with users has proved to be problematic. In early 2021, a database selling phone numbers pulled from Facebook was selling numbers for $20 per lookup. Similarly, security researchers found a network of deepfake bots on the platform that were generating images of people submitted by users to create non-consensual imagery, some of which involved children. At its heart, Telegram is little more than a messaging app like WhatsApp or Signal. But it also offers open channels that enable a single user, or a group of users, to communicate with large numbers in a method similar to a Twitter account. This has proven to be both a blessing and a curse for Telegram and its users, since these channels can be used for both good and ill. Right now, as Wired reports, the app is a key way for Ukrainians to receive updates from the government during the invasion.
from ar
