когда кто-то задаётся вопросами мотивации или использует отговорки что типа денег нет чтобы стартануть что-то я предлагаю поучиться у торчков у этих скотов сука всегда ОТКУДА-ТО НАЙДУТСЯ И ДЕНЬГИ И МОТИВАЦИЯ иногда я думаю что они трут лампу блять откуда у них деньги на торчебазу? я каждый раз ахуеваю всемогущие блять
когда кто-то задаётся вопросами мотивации или использует отговорки что типа денег нет чтобы стартануть что-то я предлагаю поучиться у торчков у этих скотов сука всегда ОТКУДА-ТО НАЙДУТСЯ И ДЕНЬГИ И МОТИВАЦИЯ иногда я думаю что они трут лампу блять откуда у них деньги на торчебазу? я каждый раз ахуеваю всемогущие блять
BY Аня Стезия
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
Given the pro-privacy stance of the platform, it’s taken as a given that it’ll be used for a number of reasons, not all of them good. And Telegram has been attached to a fair few scandals related to terrorism, sexual exploitation and crime. Back in 2015, Vox described Telegram as “ISIS’ app of choice,” saying that the platform’s real use is the ability to use channels to distribute material to large groups at once. Telegram has acted to remove public channels affiliated with terrorism, but Pavel Durov reiterated that he had no business snooping on private conversations. Although some channels have been removed, the curation process is considered opaque and insufficient by analysts. Oh no. There’s a certain degree of myth-making around what exactly went on, so take everything that follows lightly. Telegram was originally launched as a side project by the Durov brothers, with Nikolai handling the coding and Pavel as CEO, while both were at VK. This ability to mix the public and the private, as well as the ability to use bots to engage with users has proved to be problematic. In early 2021, a database selling phone numbers pulled from Facebook was selling numbers for $20 per lookup. Similarly, security researchers found a network of deepfake bots on the platform that were generating images of people submitted by users to create non-consensual imagery, some of which involved children. But because group chats and the channel features are not end-to-end encrypted, Galperin said user privacy is potentially under threat.
from ar
