Президент Путин начал оф/визит в Китай. Сказать, что он исторический - мало. Он - переломный и за ним следят так, как ни за одним другим. Поездки Байдена уже мало, что решают. Будет много сообщений и знаковых фраз.
Президент Путин начал оф/визит в Китай. Сказать, что он исторический - мало. Он - переломный и за ним следят так, как ни за одним другим. Поездки Байдена уже мало, что решают. Будет много сообщений и знаковых фраз.
BY БОЛЬШОЙ ТРАНСФЕР
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
In 2018, Russia banned Telegram although it reversed the prohibition two years later. You may recall that, back when Facebook started changing WhatsApp’s terms of service, a number of news outlets reported on, and even recommended, switching to Telegram. Pavel Durov even said that users should delete WhatsApp “unless you are cool with all of your photos and messages becoming public one day.” But Telegram can’t be described as a more-secure version of WhatsApp. In addition, Telegram's architecture limits the ability to slow the spread of false information: the lack of a central public feed, and the fact that comments are easily disabled in channels, reduce the space for public pushback. This ability to mix the public and the private, as well as the ability to use bots to engage with users has proved to be problematic. In early 2021, a database selling phone numbers pulled from Facebook was selling numbers for $20 per lookup. Similarly, security researchers found a network of deepfake bots on the platform that were generating images of people submitted by users to create non-consensual imagery, some of which involved children. The message was not authentic, with the real Zelenskiy soon denying the claim on his official Telegram channel, but the incident highlighted a major problem: disinformation quickly spreads unchecked on the encrypted app.
from ar