Проснулись от громкого и долгого стука в дверь. На вопрос, кто это, мужской голос ответил: «ФСБ» Я спросила: «А зачем?» И он ответил, что «для проведения *невнятно* мероприятий. Вызвали адвоката, сказали, что когда он приедет, мы откроем. Между Катей и сотрудником за дверью состоялся диалог: -Может быть вам водички вынести? -Мы щас дверь прострелим
Мы спрятали Тимура, чтобы он не попался под раздачу (он все лаял на дверь) и сидим ждем. У двери - тишина, они куда-то ушли. Мы думали, что они пошли за пилой для двери, но пока дверь не пилят.
Проснулись от громкого и долгого стука в дверь. На вопрос, кто это, мужской голос ответил: «ФСБ» Я спросила: «А зачем?» И он ответил, что «для проведения *невнятно* мероприятий. Вызвали адвоката, сказали, что когда он приедет, мы откроем. Между Катей и сотрудником за дверью состоялся диалог: -Может быть вам водички вынести? -Мы щас дверь прострелим
Мы спрятали Тимура, чтобы он не попался под раздачу (он все лаял на дверь) и сидим ждем. У двери - тишина, они куда-то ушли. Мы думали, что они пошли за пилой для двери, но пока дверь не пилят.
This ability to mix the public and the private, as well as the ability to use bots to engage with users has proved to be problematic. In early 2021, a database selling phone numbers pulled from Facebook was selling numbers for $20 per lookup. Similarly, security researchers found a network of deepfake bots on the platform that were generating images of people submitted by users to create non-consensual imagery, some of which involved children. If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats. Telegram has become more interventionist over time, and has steadily increased its efforts to shut down these accounts. But this has also meant that the company has also engaged with lawmakers more generally, although it maintains that it doesn’t do so willingly. For instance, in September 2021, Telegram reportedly blocked a chat bot in support of (Putin critic) Alexei Navalny during Russia’s most recent parliamentary elections. Pavel Durov was quoted at the time saying that the company was obliged to follow a “legitimate” law of the land. He added that as Apple and Google both follow the law, to violate it would give both platforms a reason to boot the messenger from its stores. At its heart, Telegram is little more than a messaging app like WhatsApp or Signal. But it also offers open channels that enable a single user, or a group of users, to communicate with large numbers in a method similar to a Twitter account. This has proven to be both a blessing and a curse for Telegram and its users, since these channels can be used for both good and ill. Right now, as Wired reports, the app is a key way for Ukrainians to receive updates from the government during the invasion. Groups are also not fully encrypted, end-to-end. This includes private groups. Private groups cannot be seen by other Telegram users, but Telegram itself can see the groups and all of the communications that you have in them. All of the same risks and warnings about channels can be applied to groups.
from ar
