В нашу жизнь приходит радость, когда у нас есть чем заняться; есть кого любить; и есть на что надеяться. 📝Виктор Франкл
Кстати, про радость: у журнала «Фома» вышел чудесный новогодний подкаст✨ Матушки рассказывают, что и как они готовят для своей семьи, беседуют о ПП, обжорстве и праздничных традициях и искромётно шутят! 💥
В нашу жизнь приходит радость, когда у нас есть чем заняться; есть кого любить; и есть на что надеяться. 📝Виктор Франкл
Кстати, про радость: у журнала «Фома» вышел чудесный новогодний подкаст✨ Матушки рассказывают, что и как они готовят для своей семьи, беседуют о ПП, обжорстве и праздничных традициях и искромётно шутят! 💥
If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats. Again, in contrast to Facebook, Google and Twitter, Telegram's founder Pavel Durov runs his company in relative secrecy from Dubai. "The argument from Telegram is, 'You should trust us because we tell you that we're trustworthy,'" Maréchal said. "It's really in the eye of the beholder whether that's something you want to buy into." You may recall that, back when Facebook started changing WhatsApp’s terms of service, a number of news outlets reported on, and even recommended, switching to Telegram. Pavel Durov even said that users should delete WhatsApp “unless you are cool with all of your photos and messages becoming public one day.” But Telegram can’t be described as a more-secure version of WhatsApp. Telegram boasts 500 million users, who share information individually and in groups in relative security. But Telegram's use as a one-way broadcast channel — which followers can join but not reply to — means content from inauthentic accounts can easily reach large, captive and eager audiences.
from ar
