До выхода книги остается неделя, но уже сейчас можно ознакомиться с 11-й главой книги, в которой Бетани Аллен описывает, как в условиях неолиберальной внешнеторговой среды КНР использует экономические рычаги для достижения геополитических целей и как на это реагировали администрации Трампа и Байдена.
Напомним, что до 10 октября в «Пиотровском» можно оформить предзаказ на книгу со скидкой 10%.
До выхода книги остается неделя, но уже сейчас можно ознакомиться с 11-й главой книги, в которой Бетани Аллен описывает, как в условиях неолиберальной внешнеторговой среды КНР использует экономические рычаги для достижения геополитических целей и как на это реагировали администрации Трампа и Байдена.
Напомним, что до 10 октября в «Пиотровском» можно оформить предзаказ на книгу со скидкой 10%.
If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats. Telegram boasts 500 million users, who share information individually and in groups in relative security. But Telegram's use as a one-way broadcast channel — which followers can join but not reply to — means content from inauthentic accounts can easily reach large, captive and eager audiences. WhatsApp, a rival messaging platform, introduced some measures to counter disinformation when Covid-19 was first sweeping the world. Oh no. There’s a certain degree of myth-making around what exactly went on, so take everything that follows lightly. Telegram was originally launched as a side project by the Durov brothers, with Nikolai handling the coding and Pavel as CEO, while both were at VK. Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders.
from ar
