Вы серьезно считаете, что человек, который на праймериз в Заксобрание набрал 118 голосов может быть занозой? Это просто как назойливая муха, которая жужжит и не приносит никакого вреда.
А вот репутационные потери, которые несет Павел, превратившись из неплохого журналиста в клоуна - куда серьезнее вопрос.
Вы серьезно считаете, что человек, который на праймериз в Заксобрание набрал 118 голосов может быть занозой? Это просто как назойливая муха, которая жужжит и не приносит никакого вреда.
А вот репутационные потери, которые несет Павел, превратившись из неплохого журналиста в клоуна - куда серьезнее вопрос.
If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats. "Your messages about the movement of the enemy through the official chatbot … bring new trophies every day," the government agency tweeted. But the Ukraine Crisis Media Center's Tsekhanovska points out that communications are often down in zones most affected by the war, making this sort of cross-referencing a luxury many cannot afford. "There is a significant risk of insider threat or hacking of Telegram systems that could expose all of these chats to the Russian government," said Eva Galperin with the Electronic Frontier Foundation, which has called for Telegram to improve its privacy practices.
from ar
