"21 век" на Кирова полностью эвакуировали. В здание позвонили неизвестные и сообщили о минировании. Сейчас идет проверка, на месте работают спецслужбы.
Подробности уточняются.
❗️UPD: Украинское ЦИПсО звонит в калужские школы, больницы и ТЦ с угрозами минирования. Сейчас оперативные службы проверяют все сообщения.
"21 век" на Кирова полностью эвакуировали. В здание позвонили неизвестные и сообщили о минировании. Сейчас идет проверка, на месте работают спецслужбы.
Подробности уточняются.
❗️UPD: Украинское ЦИПсО звонит в калужские школы, больницы и ТЦ с угрозами минирования. Сейчас оперативные службы проверяют все сообщения.
Telegram has become more interventionist over time, and has steadily increased its efforts to shut down these accounts. But this has also meant that the company has also engaged with lawmakers more generally, although it maintains that it doesn’t do so willingly. For instance, in September 2021, Telegram reportedly blocked a chat bot in support of (Putin critic) Alexei Navalny during Russia’s most recent parliamentary elections. Pavel Durov was quoted at the time saying that the company was obliged to follow a “legitimate” law of the land. He added that as Apple and Google both follow the law, to violate it would give both platforms a reason to boot the messenger from its stores. In addition, Telegram's architecture limits the ability to slow the spread of false information: the lack of a central public feed, and the fact that comments are easily disabled in channels, reduce the space for public pushback. In 2018, Russia banned Telegram although it reversed the prohibition two years later. "The argument from Telegram is, 'You should trust us because we tell you that we're trustworthy,'" Maréchal said. "It's really in the eye of the beholder whether that's something you want to buy into." In the United States, Telegram's lower public profile has helped it mostly avoid high level scrutiny from Congress, but it has not gone unnoticed.
from ar
