Есть люди, которые так высоко ценят свои заслуги, что все приписывают самим себе, а не Тому, Кто их сотворил и умудрил, не Подателю благ. Слово Божие учит их, что нужна Божия помощь даже для того, чтобы пожелать добра, тем более само избрание должного есть нечто божественное, дар Божиего человеколюбия. Ибо дело спасения зависит как от нас, так и от Бога.
Есть люди, которые так высоко ценят свои заслуги, что все приписывают самим себе, а не Тому, Кто их сотворил и умудрил, не Подателю благ. Слово Божие учит их, что нужна Божия помощь даже для того, чтобы пожелать добра, тем более само избрание должного есть нечто божественное, дар Божиего человеколюбия. Ибо дело спасения зависит как от нас, так и от Бога.
The account, "War on Fakes," was created on February 24, the same day Russian President Vladimir Putin announced a "special military operation" and troops began invading Ukraine. The page is rife with disinformation, according to The Atlantic Council's Digital Forensic Research Lab, which studies digital extremism and published a report examining the channel. On February 27th, Durov posted that Channels were becoming a source of unverified information and that the company lacks the ability to check on their veracity. He urged users to be mistrustful of the things shared on Channels, and initially threatened to block the feature in the countries involved for the length of the war, saying that he didn’t want Telegram to be used to aggravate conflict or incite ethnic hatred. He did, however, walk back this plan when it became clear that they had also become a vital communications tool for Ukrainian officials and citizens to help coordinate their resistance and evacuations. You may recall that, back when Facebook started changing WhatsApp’s terms of service, a number of news outlets reported on, and even recommended, switching to Telegram. Pavel Durov even said that users should delete WhatsApp “unless you are cool with all of your photos and messages becoming public one day.” But Telegram can’t be described as a more-secure version of WhatsApp. Given the pro-privacy stance of the platform, it’s taken as a given that it’ll be used for a number of reasons, not all of them good. And Telegram has been attached to a fair few scandals related to terrorism, sexual exploitation and crime. Back in 2015, Vox described Telegram as “ISIS’ app of choice,” saying that the platform’s real use is the ability to use channels to distribute material to large groups at once. Telegram has acted to remove public channels affiliated with terrorism, but Pavel Durov reiterated that he had no business snooping on private conversations. So, uh, whenever I hear about Telegram, it’s always in relation to something bad. What gives?
from ar
