И перед сном рассматриваю очень красивый минимализм Tod’s. Отличная работа с формами и материалами, причем без ухода в излишнюю сложность. Нравится минимум акцентных деталей в аксессуарах и уклон именно в цельность образов. Большинство луков точно прижилось бы в моем гардеробе, особенно с такой медитативной цветовой гаммой ❤️
И перед сном рассматриваю очень красивый минимализм Tod’s. Отличная работа с формами и материалами, причем без ухода в излишнюю сложность. Нравится минимум акцентных деталей в аксессуарах и уклон именно в цельность образов. Большинство луков точно прижилось бы в моем гардеробе, особенно с такой медитативной цветовой гаммой ❤️
"There are a lot of things that Telegram could have been doing this whole time. And they know exactly what they are and they've chosen not to do them. That's why I don't trust them," she said. Telegram boasts 500 million users, who share information individually and in groups in relative security. But Telegram's use as a one-way broadcast channel — which followers can join but not reply to — means content from inauthentic accounts can easily reach large, captive and eager audiences. Telegram has gained a reputation as the “secure” communications app in the post-Soviet states, but whenever you make choices about your digital security, it’s important to start by asking yourself, “What exactly am I securing? And who am I securing it from?” These questions should inform your decisions about whether you are using the right tool or platform for your digital security needs. Telegram is certainly not the most secure messaging app on the market right now. Its security model requires users to place a great deal of trust in Telegram’s ability to protect user data. For some users, this may be good enough for now. For others, it may be wiser to move to a different platform for certain kinds of high-risk communications. Stocks dropped on Friday afternoon, as gains made earlier in the day on hopes for diplomatic progress between Russia and Ukraine turned to losses. Technology stocks were hit particularly hard by higher bond yields. The next bit isn’t clear, but Durov reportedly claimed that his resignation, dated March 21st, was an April Fools’ prank. TechCrunch implies that it was a matter of principle, but it’s hard to be clear on the wheres, whos and whys. Similarly, on April 17th, the Moscow Times quoted Durov as saying that he quit the company after being pressured to reveal account details about Ukrainians protesting the then-president Viktor Yanukovych.
from ar
