Warning: mkdir(): No space left on device in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 37

Warning: file_put_contents(aCache/aDaily/post/midcenturymodern/-16883-16884-16885-16886-16887-16888-16889-16890-): Failed to open stream: No such file or directory in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 50
Mid-Century, More Than | Telegram Webview: midcenturymodern/16890 -
Telegram Group & Telegram Channel
В 1960 г., следуя общеамериканскому курсу на удвоение нажитого, известная нам американская ассоциация производителей фанеры (Douglas Fir Plywood Association) выпустила брошюру, в которой постулировала, что каждой семье требуется два дома: «один для жизни в будние дни, а второй – для истинного отдыха». Одним из вариантов второго жилища, предлагавшихся читателям и реализованных при помощи фанеры, был дом на берегу пролива Хейла в штате Вашингтон, спроектированный известным нам Хенриком Буллом, перед которым была поставлена задача «построить загородный дом по цене второго автомобиля».

Булл и этот дополнительный дом площадью 90 кв. м. разделил на два блока: общий, с кухней и гостиной, и частный, с двумя спальнями и санузлом. Терраса, соединявшая оба блока, была перекрыта двускатной крышей, матерчатая кровля которой легко сворачивалась, и могла использоваться в качестве мангальной зоны или даже для размещения гостей (правда, в спальных мешках). А собрать такой дом без утепления и установки септика стоило 3 200 долларов, что составляло примерно половину от среднего семейного дохода за год.

P.S. С другими проектами летних домов из фанеры можно ознакомиться по этой ссылке: https://archive.org/details/SecondHomesForLeisureLiving/mode/2up

———

In 1960, when the American nation was busy doubling their real estate and other assets, Douglas Fir Plywood Association published a promotional booklet and postulated that “every family needs two homes! …one for the work week, the other for pure pleasure”. The booklet featured eighteen remarkable plywood cabins including one designed by Henrik Bull and built in Hale Passage, Washington.

Interestingly, Bull, whom we already know from a couple of other cabin designs and who was tasked with building a cabin “for the cost of a second car”, opted for splitting this 90 sq. m. second home into two units, one with private quarters (two bedrooms and a bathroom) and the other with a kitchen and living room. The sundeck that connected the units was covered with a convertible pitch roof made of canvas and was to include a barbecue area and accommodate additional guests in sleeping bags, if necessary. The cost of assembling this second home (albeit with no insulation or septic tank) amounted to USD 3,200 which translated into half of an average annual family income in 1960.

P.S. Other designs in this booklet, which are just as inspiring, can be found here: https://archive.org/details/SecondHomesForLeisureLiving/mode/2up

(photos: Flickr user MidCentArc, archive.org, grainedit.com, tahoequarterly.com)



group-telegram.com/midcenturymodern/16890
Create:
Last Update:

В 1960 г., следуя общеамериканскому курсу на удвоение нажитого, известная нам американская ассоциация производителей фанеры (Douglas Fir Plywood Association) выпустила брошюру, в которой постулировала, что каждой семье требуется два дома: «один для жизни в будние дни, а второй – для истинного отдыха». Одним из вариантов второго жилища, предлагавшихся читателям и реализованных при помощи фанеры, был дом на берегу пролива Хейла в штате Вашингтон, спроектированный известным нам Хенриком Буллом, перед которым была поставлена задача «построить загородный дом по цене второго автомобиля».

Булл и этот дополнительный дом площадью 90 кв. м. разделил на два блока: общий, с кухней и гостиной, и частный, с двумя спальнями и санузлом. Терраса, соединявшая оба блока, была перекрыта двускатной крышей, матерчатая кровля которой легко сворачивалась, и могла использоваться в качестве мангальной зоны или даже для размещения гостей (правда, в спальных мешках). А собрать такой дом без утепления и установки септика стоило 3 200 долларов, что составляло примерно половину от среднего семейного дохода за год.

P.S. С другими проектами летних домов из фанеры можно ознакомиться по этой ссылке: https://archive.org/details/SecondHomesForLeisureLiving/mode/2up

———

In 1960, when the American nation was busy doubling their real estate and other assets, Douglas Fir Plywood Association published a promotional booklet and postulated that “every family needs two homes! …one for the work week, the other for pure pleasure”. The booklet featured eighteen remarkable plywood cabins including one designed by Henrik Bull and built in Hale Passage, Washington.

Interestingly, Bull, whom we already know from a couple of other cabin designs and who was tasked with building a cabin “for the cost of a second car”, opted for splitting this 90 sq. m. second home into two units, one with private quarters (two bedrooms and a bathroom) and the other with a kitchen and living room. The sundeck that connected the units was covered with a convertible pitch roof made of canvas and was to include a barbecue area and accommodate additional guests in sleeping bags, if necessary. The cost of assembling this second home (albeit with no insulation or septic tank) amounted to USD 3,200 which translated into half of an average annual family income in 1960.

P.S. Other designs in this booklet, which are just as inspiring, can be found here: https://archive.org/details/SecondHomesForLeisureLiving/mode/2up

(photos: Flickr user MidCentArc, archive.org, grainedit.com, tahoequarterly.com)

BY Mid-Century, More Than











Share with your friend now:
group-telegram.com/midcenturymodern/16890

View MORE
Open in Telegram


Telegram | DID YOU KNOW?

Date: |

"Your messages about the movement of the enemy through the official chatbot … bring new trophies every day," the government agency tweeted. Given the pro-privacy stance of the platform, it’s taken as a given that it’ll be used for a number of reasons, not all of them good. And Telegram has been attached to a fair few scandals related to terrorism, sexual exploitation and crime. Back in 2015, Vox described Telegram as “ISIS’ app of choice,” saying that the platform’s real use is the ability to use channels to distribute material to large groups at once. Telegram has acted to remove public channels affiliated with terrorism, but Pavel Durov reiterated that he had no business snooping on private conversations. I want a secure messaging app, should I use Telegram? Telegram has become more interventionist over time, and has steadily increased its efforts to shut down these accounts. But this has also meant that the company has also engaged with lawmakers more generally, although it maintains that it doesn’t do so willingly. For instance, in September 2021, Telegram reportedly blocked a chat bot in support of (Putin critic) Alexei Navalny during Russia’s most recent parliamentary elections. Pavel Durov was quoted at the time saying that the company was obliged to follow a “legitimate” law of the land. He added that as Apple and Google both follow the law, to violate it would give both platforms a reason to boot the messenger from its stores. "The result is on this photo: fiery 'greetings' to the invaders," the Security Service of Ukraine wrote alongside a photo showing several military vehicles among plumes of black smoke.
from ar


Telegram Mid-Century, More Than
FROM American