Можно открывать постоянную рубрику: «Лазурные ДТП» ——— Кадры жесткого тарана автобусом припаркованного грузовика на Оранжерейной улице в Пушкине. Мужчине чудом повезло уцелеть: «лазурный» на скорости снес его машину. В ДТП никто не пострадал.
Можно открывать постоянную рубрику: «Лазурные ДТП» ——— Кадры жесткого тарана автобусом припаркованного грузовика на Оранжерейной улице в Пушкине. Мужчине чудом повезло уцелеть: «лазурный» на скорости снес его машину. В ДТП никто не пострадал.
"There are a lot of things that Telegram could have been doing this whole time. And they know exactly what they are and they've chosen not to do them. That's why I don't trust them," she said. Recently, Durav wrote on his Telegram channel that users' right to privacy, in light of the war in Ukraine, is "sacred, now more than ever." In addition, Telegram's architecture limits the ability to slow the spread of false information: the lack of a central public feed, and the fact that comments are easily disabled in channels, reduce the space for public pushback. This ability to mix the public and the private, as well as the ability to use bots to engage with users has proved to be problematic. In early 2021, a database selling phone numbers pulled from Facebook was selling numbers for $20 per lookup. Similarly, security researchers found a network of deepfake bots on the platform that were generating images of people submitted by users to create non-consensual imagery, some of which involved children. Telegram has become more interventionist over time, and has steadily increased its efforts to shut down these accounts. But this has also meant that the company has also engaged with lawmakers more generally, although it maintains that it doesn’t do so willingly. For instance, in September 2021, Telegram reportedly blocked a chat bot in support of (Putin critic) Alexei Navalny during Russia’s most recent parliamentary elections. Pavel Durov was quoted at the time saying that the company was obliged to follow a “legitimate” law of the land. He added that as Apple and Google both follow the law, to violate it would give both platforms a reason to boot the messenger from its stores.
from ar
