Назвать погибших в бою трусами это уже верх беспредела!
Учитывая что вопрос на личном контроле у Президента и Министра обороны, а само дело имеет огромный общественный резонанс и определенную и четкую народную оценку.
Такими действиями подрывается основа института поддержки сво. Народ просто не понимает зачем воевать, если после героической смерти на тебя выливают ведра помоев и называют трусом.
Назвать погибших в бою трусами это уже верх беспредела!
Учитывая что вопрос на личном контроле у Президента и Министра обороны, а само дело имеет огромный общественный резонанс и определенную и четкую народную оценку.
Такими действиями подрывается основа института поддержки сво. Народ просто не понимает зачем воевать, если после героической смерти на тебя выливают ведра помоев и называют трусом.
Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders. In 2018, Russia banned Telegram although it reversed the prohibition two years later. Russians and Ukrainians are both prolific users of Telegram. They rely on the app for channels that act as newsfeeds, group chats (both public and private), and one-to-one communication. Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine, Telegram has remained an important lifeline for both Russians and Ukrainians, as a way of staying aware of the latest news and keeping in touch with loved ones. These administrators had built substantial positions in these scrips prior to the circulation of recommendations and offloaded their positions subsequent to rise in price of these scrips, making significant profits at the expense of unsuspecting investors, Sebi noted. At this point, however, Durov had already been working on Telegram with his brother, and further planned a mobile-first social network with an explicit focus on anti-censorship. Later in April, he told TechCrunch that he had left Russia and had “no plans to go back,” saying that the nation was currently “incompatible with internet business at the moment.” He added later that he was looking for a country that matched his libertarian ideals to base his next startup.
from ar
