Также к Андрею Зачупейко обратились жители дома №10 по улице Кирова. Они обеспокоены состоянием двора после недавнего благоустройства. Там, в рамках муниципального контракта и с учетом 20% софинансирования со стороны жильцов сделали дорогу и тротуары. Жители считают, что работы провели некачественно. Парламентарий взял ситуацию на депутатский контроль.
Также к Андрею Зачупейко обратились жители дома №10 по улице Кирова. Они обеспокоены состоянием двора после недавнего благоустройства. Там, в рамках муниципального контракта и с учетом 20% софинансирования со стороны жильцов сделали дорогу и тротуары. Жители считают, что работы провели некачественно. Парламентарий взял ситуацию на депутатский контроль.
Messages are not fully encrypted by default. That means the company could, in theory, access the content of the messages, or be forced to hand over the data at the request of a government. The Russian invasion of Ukraine has been a driving force in markets for the past few weeks. Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders. Individual messages can be fully encrypted. But the user has to turn on that function. It's not automatic, as it is on Signal and WhatsApp. This ability to mix the public and the private, as well as the ability to use bots to engage with users has proved to be problematic. In early 2021, a database selling phone numbers pulled from Facebook was selling numbers for $20 per lookup. Similarly, security researchers found a network of deepfake bots on the platform that were generating images of people submitted by users to create non-consensual imagery, some of which involved children.
from ar
