Вчера был день рождения у патологического садиста и психопата, профессионального убийцы кошек и любителя бить сапогом в живот беременных Стефана Бандеры. В честь этого «свята» продублирую свой пост о том, что из себя представляла организованная этим трусливым извращенцем банда под названием «ОУН — УПА». https://www.group-telegram.com/stargaseta/1540
Вчера был день рождения у патологического садиста и психопата, профессионального убийцы кошек и любителя бить сапогом в живот беременных Стефана Бандеры. В честь этого «свята» продублирую свой пост о том, что из себя представляла организованная этим трусливым извращенцем банда под названием «ОУН — УПА». https://www.group-telegram.com/stargaseta/1540
BY Православное Сопротивление Великой, Малой и Белой Руси
Elsewhere, version 8.6 of Telegram integrates the in-app camera option into the gallery, while a new navigation bar gives quick access to photos, files, location sharing, and more. "He has to start being more proactive and to find a real solution to this situation, not stay in standby without interfering. It's a very irresponsible position from the owner of Telegram," she said. Given the pro-privacy stance of the platform, it’s taken as a given that it’ll be used for a number of reasons, not all of them good. And Telegram has been attached to a fair few scandals related to terrorism, sexual exploitation and crime. Back in 2015, Vox described Telegram as “ISIS’ app of choice,” saying that the platform’s real use is the ability to use channels to distribute material to large groups at once. Telegram has acted to remove public channels affiliated with terrorism, but Pavel Durov reiterated that he had no business snooping on private conversations. This ability to mix the public and the private, as well as the ability to use bots to engage with users has proved to be problematic. In early 2021, a database selling phone numbers pulled from Facebook was selling numbers for $20 per lookup. Similarly, security researchers found a network of deepfake bots on the platform that were generating images of people submitted by users to create non-consensual imagery, some of which involved children. Although some channels have been removed, the curation process is considered opaque and insufficient by analysts.
from ar
