А это - один из основателей псевдо-благотворительной пробандеровской организации «Голубь мира». Станислав Суслов. Можно просто Стасян-дебил. Родом из Новосибирска. Живет в Нови-Саде. На фото позирует с флагом так называемых Соединённых Штатов Сибири, сепаратистский проект которых был придуман в ГосДепе. Стасян-дебил мечтает о развале России, уверяет всех, что Косово это Албания, да и вообще много и адово гонит. Суслов уверен, что он настоящий боевой сепаратист и борец с «кровавым российским режЫмом», но на самом деле он тупой как валенок и психически больной неврастеник, сидящий на антидепрессантах и алкоголе.
А это - один из основателей псевдо-благотворительной пробандеровской организации «Голубь мира». Станислав Суслов. Можно просто Стасян-дебил. Родом из Новосибирска. Живет в Нови-Саде. На фото позирует с флагом так называемых Соединённых Штатов Сибири, сепаратистский проект которых был придуман в ГосДепе. Стасян-дебил мечтает о развале России, уверяет всех, что Косово это Албания, да и вообще много и адово гонит. Суслов уверен, что он настоящий боевой сепаратист и борец с «кровавым российским режЫмом», но на самом деле он тупой как валенок и психически больной неврастеник, сидящий на антидепрессантах и алкоголе.
On Feb. 27, however, he admitted from his Russian-language account that "Telegram channels are increasingly becoming a source of unverified information related to Ukrainian events." What distinguishes the app from competitors is its use of what's known as channels: Public or private feeds of photos and videos that can be set up by one person or an organization. The channels have become popular with on-the-ground journalists, aid workers and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, who broadcasts on a Telegram channel. The channels can be followed by an unlimited number of people. Unlike Facebook, Twitter and other popular social networks, there is no advertising on Telegram and the flow of information is not driven by an algorithm. False news often spreads via public groups, or chats, with potentially fatal effects. Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders. On February 27th, Durov posted that Channels were becoming a source of unverified information and that the company lacks the ability to check on their veracity. He urged users to be mistrustful of the things shared on Channels, and initially threatened to block the feature in the countries involved for the length of the war, saying that he didn’t want Telegram to be used to aggravate conflict or incite ethnic hatred. He did, however, walk back this plan when it became clear that they had also become a vital communications tool for Ukrainian officials and citizens to help coordinate their resistance and evacuations.
from ar
