От перемены мест Белоусова приоритеты Госдумы не меняются. Потому что теперь «российский мужик» должен успеть сделать в своей жизни лишь две вещи: оплодотворить как можно больше женщин и отдать свою «переоцененную» жизнь за царя.
От перемены мест Белоусова приоритеты Госдумы не меняются. Потому что теперь «российский мужик» должен успеть сделать в своей жизни лишь две вещи: оплодотворить как можно больше женщин и отдать свою «переоцененную» жизнь за царя.
BY Плавильный котёл
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
Russians and Ukrainians are both prolific users of Telegram. They rely on the app for channels that act as newsfeeds, group chats (both public and private), and one-to-one communication. Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine, Telegram has remained an important lifeline for both Russians and Ukrainians, as a way of staying aware of the latest news and keeping in touch with loved ones. Given the pro-privacy stance of the platform, it’s taken as a given that it’ll be used for a number of reasons, not all of them good. And Telegram has been attached to a fair few scandals related to terrorism, sexual exploitation and crime. Back in 2015, Vox described Telegram as “ISIS’ app of choice,” saying that the platform’s real use is the ability to use channels to distribute material to large groups at once. Telegram has acted to remove public channels affiliated with terrorism, but Pavel Durov reiterated that he had no business snooping on private conversations. He said that since his platform does not have the capacity to check all channels, it may restrict some in Russia and Ukraine "for the duration of the conflict," but then reversed course hours later after many users complained that Telegram was an important source of information. The message was not authentic, with the real Zelenskiy soon denying the claim on his official Telegram channel, but the incident highlighted a major problem: disinformation quickly spreads unchecked on the encrypted app. In addition, Telegram's architecture limits the ability to slow the spread of false information: the lack of a central public feed, and the fact that comments are easily disabled in channels, reduce the space for public pushback.
from ar
