Дмитрия Муратова не остановить. Он записал еще выпуск про нападение на него. Есть очень смешные моменты, хотя конечно ничего смешного. Но нам остается только иронизировать над этим всем. Монтировал я, жду в комментариях критику и фидбек https://youtu.be/ie1rV2Gk3i8
Дмитрия Муратова не остановить. Он записал еще выпуск про нападение на него. Есть очень смешные моменты, хотя конечно ничего смешного. Но нам остается только иронизировать над этим всем. Монтировал я, жду в комментариях критику и фидбек https://youtu.be/ie1rV2Gk3i8
Some privacy experts say Telegram is not secure enough The next bit isn’t clear, but Durov reportedly claimed that his resignation, dated March 21st, was an April Fools’ prank. TechCrunch implies that it was a matter of principle, but it’s hard to be clear on the wheres, whos and whys. Similarly, on April 17th, the Moscow Times quoted Durov as saying that he quit the company after being pressured to reveal account details about Ukrainians protesting the then-president Viktor Yanukovych. Now safely in France with his spouse and three of his children, Kliuchnikov scrolls through Telegram to learn about the devastation happening in his home country. Telegram has gained a reputation as the “secure” communications app in the post-Soviet states, but whenever you make choices about your digital security, it’s important to start by asking yourself, “What exactly am I securing? And who am I securing it from?” These questions should inform your decisions about whether you are using the right tool or platform for your digital security needs. Telegram is certainly not the most secure messaging app on the market right now. Its security model requires users to place a great deal of trust in Telegram’s ability to protect user data. For some users, this may be good enough for now. For others, it may be wiser to move to a different platform for certain kinds of high-risk communications. Despite Telegram's origins, its approach to users' security has privacy advocates worried.
from ar
