С разрешения автора, отдельно публикуем комментарий Д. И. Савельева, относящийся к предыдущему посту и обсуждению под ним. Нам он представляется интересным, поскольку касается поведения А. П. Кулешова в сложившейся вокруг ИППИ ситуации.
С разрешения автора, отдельно публикуем комментарий Д. И. Савельева, относящийся к предыдущему посту и обсуждению под ним. Нам он представляется интересным, поскольку касается поведения А. П. Кулешова в сложившейся вокруг ИППИ ситуации.
BY Сохраним ИППИ
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
Telegram has become more interventionist over time, and has steadily increased its efforts to shut down these accounts. But this has also meant that the company has also engaged with lawmakers more generally, although it maintains that it doesn’t do so willingly. For instance, in September 2021, Telegram reportedly blocked a chat bot in support of (Putin critic) Alexei Navalny during Russia’s most recent parliamentary elections. Pavel Durov was quoted at the time saying that the company was obliged to follow a “legitimate” law of the land. He added that as Apple and Google both follow the law, to violate it would give both platforms a reason to boot the messenger from its stores. Anastasia Vlasova/Getty Images Update March 8, 2022: EFF has clarified that Channels and Groups are not fully encrypted, end-to-end, updated our post to link to Telegram’s FAQ for Cloud and Secret chats, updated to clarify that auto-delete is available for group and channel admins, and added some additional links. In the United States, Telegram's lower public profile has helped it mostly avoid high level scrutiny from Congress, but it has not gone unnoticed. WhatsApp, a rival messaging platform, introduced some measures to counter disinformation when Covid-19 was first sweeping the world.
from ar