Алексей из Находки/Врангель закупил и отплатил доставку пяти катушек pet-g’a для парней на ленточке. Пластик уже у нас. Формируется очередная отправка на Херсонское напр. Не оставайтесь в стороне!
Сбор продолжается: 2202202098975505 Сбер 2200152356593536 Альфа при переводе пишите в сообщении: «на пластик».
Обратная связь: @tsekh_our_new_bot В первом сообщении напишите ваш позывной, отличающийся от ника или комбинацию цифр/букв.
Алексей из Находки/Врангель закупил и отплатил доставку пяти катушек pet-g’a для парней на ленточке. Пластик уже у нас. Формируется очередная отправка на Херсонское напр. Не оставайтесь в стороне!
Сбор продолжается: 2202202098975505 Сбер 2200152356593536 Альфа при переводе пишите в сообщении: «на пластик».
Обратная связь: @tsekh_our_new_bot В первом сообщении напишите ваш позывной, отличающийся от ника или комбинацию цифр/букв.
It is unclear who runs the account, although Russia's official Ministry of Foreign Affairs Twitter account promoted the Telegram channel on Saturday and claimed it was operated by "a group of experts & journalists." Emerson Brooking, a disinformation expert at the Atlantic Council's Digital Forensic Research Lab, said: "Back in the Wild West period of content moderation, like 2014 or 2015, maybe they could have gotten away with it, but it stands in marked contrast with how other companies run themselves today." The regulator took order for the search and seizure operation from Judge Purushottam B Jadhav, Sebi Special Judge / Additional Sessions Judge. Despite Telegram's origins, its approach to users' security has privacy advocates worried. Telegram has become more interventionist over time, and has steadily increased its efforts to shut down these accounts. But this has also meant that the company has also engaged with lawmakers more generally, although it maintains that it doesn’t do so willingly. For instance, in September 2021, Telegram reportedly blocked a chat bot in support of (Putin critic) Alexei Navalny during Russia’s most recent parliamentary elections. Pavel Durov was quoted at the time saying that the company was obliged to follow a “legitimate” law of the land. He added that as Apple and Google both follow the law, to violate it would give both platforms a reason to boot the messenger from its stores.
from ar
