⛓ Тушканов получил 5 лет и 6 месяцев колонии за оправдание подрыва Крымского моста.
Сейчас против нашей страны идёт информационная война, где каждый такой « боец», оправдывая подрыв Крымского моста или обстрелы силами ВСУ Донецка и других регионов РФ, по сути, выступает против нашей страны и её исторической памяти на всём информационном поле.
Битва идёт за умы, за смыслы, за будущие поколения. Не понимать это и делать хвалебные посты в сетях, топить за Киевскую пропаганду - значит предстать перед судом, и получить по всей строгости военного времени. Что, собственно, и произошло.
⛓ Тушканов получил 5 лет и 6 месяцев колонии за оправдание подрыва Крымского моста.
Сейчас против нашей страны идёт информационная война, где каждый такой « боец», оправдывая подрыв Крымского моста или обстрелы силами ВСУ Донецка и других регионов РФ, по сути, выступает против нашей страны и её исторической памяти на всём информационном поле.
Битва идёт за умы, за смыслы, за будущие поколения. Не понимать это и делать хвалебные посты в сетях, топить за Киевскую пропаганду - значит предстать перед судом, и получить по всей строгости военного времени. Что, собственно, и произошло.
As the war in Ukraine rages, the messaging app Telegram has emerged as the go-to place for unfiltered live war updates for both Ukrainian refugees and increasingly isolated Russians alike. Given the pro-privacy stance of the platform, it’s taken as a given that it’ll be used for a number of reasons, not all of them good. And Telegram has been attached to a fair few scandals related to terrorism, sexual exploitation and crime. Back in 2015, Vox described Telegram as “ISIS’ app of choice,” saying that the platform’s real use is the ability to use channels to distribute material to large groups at once. Telegram has acted to remove public channels affiliated with terrorism, but Pavel Durov reiterated that he had no business snooping on private conversations. Oleksandra Matviichuk, a Kyiv-based lawyer and head of the Center for Civil Liberties, called Durov’s position "very weak," and urged concrete improvements. Groups are also not fully encrypted, end-to-end. This includes private groups. Private groups cannot be seen by other Telegram users, but Telegram itself can see the groups and all of the communications that you have in them. All of the same risks and warnings about channels can be applied to groups. Telegram has become more interventionist over time, and has steadily increased its efforts to shut down these accounts. But this has also meant that the company has also engaged with lawmakers more generally, although it maintains that it doesn’t do so willingly. For instance, in September 2021, Telegram reportedly blocked a chat bot in support of (Putin critic) Alexei Navalny during Russia’s most recent parliamentary elections. Pavel Durov was quoted at the time saying that the company was obliged to follow a “legitimate” law of the land. He added that as Apple and Google both follow the law, to violate it would give both platforms a reason to boot the messenger from its stores.
from ar
