Наравно да сам против полицијске бруталности, али зашто су деди дали сузавац и послали да на полицију? И какво је ово "браво" за физички напад и шутирање баке, јер је НВО говна гађала јајима. Опет кажем, говнима бре треба да вас гађају људска бедо!
Наравно да сам против полицијске бруталности, али зашто су деди дали сузавац и послали да на полицију? И какво је ово "браво" за физички напад и шутирање баке, јер је НВО говна гађала јајима. Опет кажем, говнима бре треба да вас гађају људска бедо!
The original Telegram channel has expanded into a web of accounts for different locations, including specific pages made for individual Russian cities. There's also an English-language website, which states it is owned by the people who run the Telegram channels. But Kliuchnikov, the Ukranian now in France, said he will use Signal or WhatsApp for sensitive conversations, but questions around privacy on Telegram do not give him pause when it comes to sharing information about the war. At its heart, Telegram is little more than a messaging app like WhatsApp or Signal. But it also offers open channels that enable a single user, or a group of users, to communicate with large numbers in a method similar to a Twitter account. This has proven to be both a blessing and a curse for Telegram and its users, since these channels can be used for both good and ill. Right now, as Wired reports, the app is a key way for Ukrainians to receive updates from the government during the invasion. Such instructions could actually endanger people — citizens receive air strike warnings via smartphone alerts. Telegram, which does little policing of its content, has also became a hub for Russian propaganda and misinformation. Many pro-Kremlin channels have become popular, alongside accounts of journalists and other independent observers.
from ar