В карточках рассказали, что какие бывают террористические организации, какую идеологию преследуют враги народа, а также какая ответственность наступает за поддержку террористов!
О предателях, диверсантах, террористах и врагах пишите сюда: 📱@LETTER_TO_OPER_bot без регистрации, необходимости вводить персональные данные, в том числе личный номер телефона!
В карточках рассказали, что какие бывают террористические организации, какую идеологию преследуют враги народа, а также какая ответственность наступает за поддержку террористов!
О предателях, диверсантах, террористах и врагах пишите сюда: 📱@LETTER_TO_OPER_bot без регистрации, необходимости вводить персональные данные, в том числе личный номер телефона!
This ability to mix the public and the private, as well as the ability to use bots to engage with users has proved to be problematic. In early 2021, a database selling phone numbers pulled from Facebook was selling numbers for $20 per lookup. Similarly, security researchers found a network of deepfake bots on the platform that were generating images of people submitted by users to create non-consensual imagery, some of which involved children. Also in the latest update is the ability for users to create a unique @username from the Settings page, providing others with an easy way to contact them via Search or their t.me/username link without sharing their phone number. If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats. DFR Lab sent the image through Microsoft Azure's Face Verification program and found that it was "highly unlikely" that the person in the second photo was the same as the first woman. The fact-checker Logically AI also found the claim to be false. The woman, Olena Kurilo, was also captured in a video after the airstrike and shown to have the injuries. "We as Ukrainians believe that the truth is on our side, whether it's truth that you're proclaiming about the war and everything else, why would you want to hide it?," he said.
from ar
