Telegram Group & Telegram Channel
The idea of a free market economy where all businesses are worker cooperatives—and whether such a system (often called market socialism)—could work is a topic of significant debate. Let’s break this down:

---

### 1. Can All Businesses Be Cooperatives in a Free Market?
A cooperative economy would mean replacing traditional capitalist firms (owned by shareholders) with worker-owned cooperatives, where employees democratically control the business and share profits. Here’s the case for and against:

#### Arguments For
- Feasibility:
- Existing Examples: Worker cooperatives like Spain’s Mondragon Corporation (a federation of 260+ cooperatives with 80,000+ workers) and Italy’s Emilia-Romagna region (where 30% of GDP comes from cooperatives) show cooperatives can thrive in competitive markets.
- Resilience: Studies suggest cooperatives often have higher productivity, lower turnover, and greater stability during crises (e.g., the 2008 recession).
- Ethical Incentives: Worker-owners have a direct stake in the firm’s success, aligning incentives for innovation and efficiency.

- Market Compatibility:
- Cooperatives can compete in free markets, setting prices, responding to demand, and reinvesting profits. Markets need not disappear—they’d just operate within a framework of worker ownership.

#### Challenges
- Capital Acquisition:
- Cooperatives often struggle to raise external investment, as traditional investors seek equity ownership and high returns. Solutions like "non-voting shares" or cooperative banks (e.g., Italy’s Banca Popolare) could help, but scaling this globally is untested.
- Startups in high-risk sectors (e.g., tech) might face hurdles without venture capital’s risk-tolerant model.

- Scalability and Decision-Making:
- Large cooperatives require complex democratic governance, which can slow decision-making. Mondragon mitigates this with hybrid structures (e.g., elected managers), but critics argue this risks recreating hierarchies.
- Industries requiring rapid innovation (e.g., AI, biotech) might struggle with consensus-driven models.

- Systemic Barriers:
- Legal and financial systems in capitalist economies favor traditional corporate structures. Transitioning to a cooperative economy would require rewriting corporate law, tax codes, and financial regulations.

---

### 2. Can Market Socialism Work?
Market socialism combines worker ownership with market competition, rejecting both central planning and capitalist ownership. Key features:
- Worker-Owned Firms: Employees control workplaces democratically.
- Markets for Goods/Services: Prices are set by supply and demand, not state planners.
- Social Welfare and Regulation: Strong safety nets, antitrust laws, and environmental regulations prevent market excesses.

#### Case Studies and Models
- Yugoslavia’s Experiment (1950s–1980s):
- Practiced "worker self-management" in a market framework. Initially successful (high growth, reduced inequality), but later collapsed due to debt, ethnic tensions, and inefficiencies.
- Lessons: Worker control alone isn’t sufficient without macroeconomic stability, democratic institutions, and checks on bureaucracy.

- Modern Examples:
- Mondragon, Spain: Thrives in manufacturing, finance, and education, balancing competition with solidarity (e.g., wage ratios capped at 6:1).
- Kerala, India: A mix of cooperatives, public sector, and private firms in a regulated market, achieving high human development indicators.

- Theoretical Models:
- David Schweickart’s "Economic Democracy": Combines worker cooperatives, public control of investment (via a capital assets tax), and markets. Profits fund public goods and new cooperatives.
- Richard Wolff’s "Workers’ Self-Directed Enterprises": Similar to Schweickart but emphasizes workplace democracy over state intervention.



group-telegram.com/wobbliechannel/8883
Create:
Last Update:

The idea of a free market economy where all businesses are worker cooperatives—and whether such a system (often called market socialism)—could work is a topic of significant debate. Let’s break this down:

---

### 1. Can All Businesses Be Cooperatives in a Free Market?
A cooperative economy would mean replacing traditional capitalist firms (owned by shareholders) with worker-owned cooperatives, where employees democratically control the business and share profits. Here’s the case for and against:

#### Arguments For
- Feasibility:
- Existing Examples: Worker cooperatives like Spain’s Mondragon Corporation (a federation of 260+ cooperatives with 80,000+ workers) and Italy’s Emilia-Romagna region (where 30% of GDP comes from cooperatives) show cooperatives can thrive in competitive markets.
- Resilience: Studies suggest cooperatives often have higher productivity, lower turnover, and greater stability during crises (e.g., the 2008 recession).
- Ethical Incentives: Worker-owners have a direct stake in the firm’s success, aligning incentives for innovation and efficiency.

- Market Compatibility:
- Cooperatives can compete in free markets, setting prices, responding to demand, and reinvesting profits. Markets need not disappear—they’d just operate within a framework of worker ownership.

#### Challenges
- Capital Acquisition:
- Cooperatives often struggle to raise external investment, as traditional investors seek equity ownership and high returns. Solutions like "non-voting shares" or cooperative banks (e.g., Italy’s Banca Popolare) could help, but scaling this globally is untested.
- Startups in high-risk sectors (e.g., tech) might face hurdles without venture capital’s risk-tolerant model.

- Scalability and Decision-Making:
- Large cooperatives require complex democratic governance, which can slow decision-making. Mondragon mitigates this with hybrid structures (e.g., elected managers), but critics argue this risks recreating hierarchies.
- Industries requiring rapid innovation (e.g., AI, biotech) might struggle with consensus-driven models.

- Systemic Barriers:
- Legal and financial systems in capitalist economies favor traditional corporate structures. Transitioning to a cooperative economy would require rewriting corporate law, tax codes, and financial regulations.

---

### 2. Can Market Socialism Work?
Market socialism combines worker ownership with market competition, rejecting both central planning and capitalist ownership. Key features:
- Worker-Owned Firms: Employees control workplaces democratically.
- Markets for Goods/Services: Prices are set by supply and demand, not state planners.
- Social Welfare and Regulation: Strong safety nets, antitrust laws, and environmental regulations prevent market excesses.

#### Case Studies and Models
- Yugoslavia’s Experiment (1950s–1980s):
- Practiced "worker self-management" in a market framework. Initially successful (high growth, reduced inequality), but later collapsed due to debt, ethnic tensions, and inefficiencies.
- Lessons: Worker control alone isn’t sufficient without macroeconomic stability, democratic institutions, and checks on bureaucracy.

- Modern Examples:
- Mondragon, Spain: Thrives in manufacturing, finance, and education, balancing competition with solidarity (e.g., wage ratios capped at 6:1).
- Kerala, India: A mix of cooperatives, public sector, and private firms in a regulated market, achieving high human development indicators.

- Theoretical Models:
- David Schweickart’s "Economic Democracy": Combines worker cooperatives, public control of investment (via a capital assets tax), and markets. Profits fund public goods and new cooperatives.
- Richard Wolff’s "Workers’ Self-Directed Enterprises": Similar to Schweickart but emphasizes workplace democracy over state intervention.

BY IWW


Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260

Share with your friend now:
group-telegram.com/wobbliechannel/8883

View MORE
Open in Telegram


Telegram | DID YOU KNOW?

Date: |

Messages are not fully encrypted by default. That means the company could, in theory, access the content of the messages, or be forced to hand over the data at the request of a government. Telegram, which does little policing of its content, has also became a hub for Russian propaganda and misinformation. Many pro-Kremlin channels have become popular, alongside accounts of journalists and other independent observers. At the start of 2018, the company attempted to launch an Initial Coin Offering (ICO) which would enable it to enable payments (and earn the cash that comes from doing so). The initial signals were promising, especially given Telegram’s user base is already fairly crypto-savvy. It raised an initial tranche of cash – worth more than a billion dollars – to help develop the coin before opening sales to the public. Unfortunately, third-party sales of coins bought in those initial fundraising rounds raised the ire of the SEC, which brought the hammer down on the whole operation. In 2020, officials ordered Telegram to pay a fine of $18.5 million and hand back much of the cash that it had raised. Some privacy experts say Telegram is not secure enough The channel appears to be part of the broader information war that has developed following Russia's invasion of Ukraine. The Kremlin has paid Russian TikTok influencers to push propaganda, according to a Vice News investigation, while ProPublica found that fake Russian fact check videos had been viewed over a million times on Telegram.
from ar


Telegram IWW
FROM American